On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 2:08 PM, Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Then why do so many schools talk about and teach on other cultures
and beliefs including their religious practice's but so very often
gloss over Christianaty? or they don't even talk about it at all.
Probably because
In a message dated 20/03/2008 21:51:12 GMT Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Nazi is short for the German phrase for National Socialist --
Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei. Nazism is a form of
Socialism. And since Socialism is left wing, it follows that Nazism
is left
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 9:08 AM, Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Then why do so many schools talk about and teach on other cultures
and beliefs including their religious practice's but so very often
gloss over Christianaty? or they don't even talk about it at all.
I don't know it its fair to
Both my kids had situations when being taught, I think it was in
social studies where they had a couple of chapters on diversity and
cultures and in that they were taught various thingsnow
understand I am not saying I disagree with that, I thought it was
great. However, when it came to
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 2:53 PM, Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Both my kids had situations when being taught, I think it was in
social studies where they had a couple of chapters on diversity and
cultures and in that they were taught various thingsnow
understand I am not saying I
They went into pretty great detail, at least they did here, And no,
personaly I did not feel slighted, I love to learn and I wanted my
kids to be the same wayI was more talking to the feeling that
some conseritives have that 'everything else' is being taught...again
for me, I say teach
Well, that certainly explains a lot..
Heath
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Delongchamp
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ah, a common misconception.
Respect is only afforded *between* religious groups because their
beliefs are all based on unreliable evidence and neither one
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For instance, standing up for the separation of church and state
guaranteed by the First Amendment isn't in any way an attack on
people's religions but is often sold as such by religious leaders.
Then why do so many schools
Fair enough. I also find it hypocritical that groups that claim to be
for tolerance but seem to have zero tolerance when it comes to
religious expression and speech and cry foul every turn.
I think its a cycle of hypocrisy all around. Do we really want to hear each
other or just WIN.
The
Fair enough. I also find it hypocritical that groups that claim to be
for tolerance but seem to have zero tolerance when it comes to
religious expression and speech and cry foul every turn.
I think its a cycle of hypocrisy all around. Do we really want to hear each
other or just WIN.
The
By the way, we do have 2 active videobloggers in this group who are
also evangelical christians.
I always enjoy their work because they ask questions and are open to dialogue.
(they also make good videos)
Dennis:
http://ymimexico.youthministrytv.com/2007/12/06/church-and-state-part-1/
Then why do so many schools talk about and teach on other cultures
and beliefs including their religious practice's but so very often
gloss over Christianaty? or they don't even talk about it at all.
If that's the case, I agree with you, Heath. If a class is talking
about religions in an
Hey all-
Let me start off by saying I certainly wouldn't call myself and evangelical
Christian. No
hard feelings towards Jay. He's great and he and Ryanne have been a big
encouragement
to me since I started videoblogging.
I do occasionally make videos about belief or exploring aspects
I think a slightly modified version of Scoop Nisker's If you don't like the
news go out and make some of your own applies here.
___
Brook Hinton
film/video/audio art
www.brookhinton.com
studio vlog/blog: www.brookhinton.com/temporalab
[Non-text
There is the demographic factor that Terry originally brought up: younger
people tend to be both more comfortable with technology (though there are
huge exceptions) and more liberal in their political/social views (again,
with exceptions). This probably accounts for a lot of the skew on YouTube
I would have thought this extended way beyond the video blogging
community and could reasonably be asked of the community in general,
where the video community is a smaller mirror of the larger one.
On the other hand you're using community to equal audience, I think
the video community (and
Ah, a common misconception.
Respect is only afforded *between* religious groups because their
beliefs are all based on unreliable evidence and neither one can say
which is the true religion. On the other hand, because I'm not
religious I can criticize religion as much as I want.
For example, I
If someone were to question my beliefs I would probably call it an
intellectually stimulating conversation. Not an intolerant attack.
It all depends on what you base your beliefs.
Cheers! To backbones and and alcohol!
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 11:11 AM, Patrick Delongchamp
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If someone were to question my beliefs I would probably call it an
intellectually stimulating conversation. Not an intolerant attack.
It all depends on what you base your beliefs.
I think you are assuming that religious people don't like their
beliefs criticized. I'm often critical of my own
In regards to your question about 3rd party candidates the answer if
simple. They do not make collective use of the opportunity they have
to get their viewpoints across. They do not vlog.
I was doing some kind of research, I think around the time of
Pixeloden. I truly wanted to find Libertarian,
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, terry.rendon
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think you are assuming that religious people don't like their
beliefs criticized. I'm often critical of my own faith beliefs. I
think here in America there are many people who are critical of
religion. However, I
True enough. But it doesn't make it any less hypocritical when
religion is used as an ivory tower from which people can launch
vicious attacks at other groups but then cry intolerance when their
own group is attacked. And that is a fairly frequent occurrence.
Fair enough. I also finding
True enough. But it doesn't make it any less hypocritical when
religion is used as an ivory tower from which people can launch
vicious attacks at other groups but then cry intolerance when their
own group is attacked. And that is a fairly frequent occurrence.
Fair enough. I also find it
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, terry.rendon
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fair enough. I also find it hypocritical that groups that claim to be
for tolerance but seem to have zero tolerance when it comes to
religious expression and speech and cry foul every turn.
I'm admittedly biased, but
because for for most communities outside of North America tolerance is
probably understood and experienced to be something that is largely
free of religion, I live in what I regard as a (sometimes) tolerant
society, and religion plays quite a small role over all. An important
one, but
Hey Steve,
I looked at this a little closer...
http://www.politicalcompass.org/analysis2
There's some criticisms I have about it. (This is of course assuming
I'm understanding it correctly. Feel free to point out any problems
in my reasoning.)
Criticism #1: I don't think the 2 properties
Hello,
After reading this, I think you're under the impression that I'm
making an argument for the Neocons -- for the dominant faction of the
Republican Party. I'm not!
Replies below.
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 4:29 PM, Ron Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I found it quite apt, actually.
Did
No, no no...I know you're not supporting the neo-cons. I just think
you're naively enabling them. Probably about what you think about me
and the Neoliberals.
Actually I bet we have a boatload in common on many issues, and after
reading your post, I know we do.
What a great conversation
diveristy and tolerance goes both ways.
Heath
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Delongchamp
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, if religious people can't speak comfortably, it probably means
the online video community is rational and intelligent. If
republicans can't speak
Thanks for the response :)
Regarding fascism, I would love to learn more about your definition of
Fascism. I have read that the Austrian School think it is a form of
socialism, and from previous discussions I guess you are influenced by
the Austrian School, but I dont actually know the details of
Or to put it another way, this is a disagreement about how humans may
organize themselves in the absence of authoritarian control.
I tend to think that neither way has much chance of coming into being,
because the vast majority of people would need to agree and be united
behind one
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 5:02 PM, Patrick Delongchamp
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The U.S. is very polarized at the moment. Americans like to think a
Republican ideology is wrong and the Democratic Ideology is right.
I don't think that's quite right. Democratic Americans like to think
that - the
So do you have any suggestions on how to get Evangelicals and
conservatives to videoblog?
Jay
That's a good question. To be honest I really don't know how.
I think both groups, religious groups and conservatives, for some
reason don't seem to effectively use film media. Of course there are
That's a good question. To be honest I really don't know how.
yeah, ive asked my other evangelical/conservative friends the same thing.
never gotten a good answer.
There's nothing stopping them.
Looking at that community's power structure, it seems very top down though.
I think both groups,
34 matches
Mail list logo
