reminds me of the early days of making interactive QT blog posts where
I'd have it works on OS 9 on Mac, latest QuickTime, no promises for
anything else :-) the point was the experimenting rather than reach.
On 02/07/2009, at 11:02 AM, Jay dedman wrote:
Ive heard other people say they may
We made a video about the subject for http://visionontv.org this is part
one: http://plugandplay.visionon.tv/
Part 2 coming soon.
Hamish
very relevant:
http://lists.whatwg.org/htdig.cgi/whatwg-whatwg.org/2009-June/020620.html
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 4:08 PM, hamish ham...@undercurrents.org wrote:
We made a video about the subject for http://visionontv.org this is part
one: http://plugandplay.visionon.tv/
Part 2 coming soon.
very relevant:
http://lists.whatwg.org/htdig.cgi/whatwg-whatwg.org/2009-June/020620.html
Good find. Ill add some context to Tim's link. Because the different
browsers cant agree to support the same codecs, video creators must fight to
figure out how to work across all browsers if they want to
ah man! they removed the video element from latest draft?
i'll have to read up on this later.
that's annoying news. hopefully the browsers keep supporting it though.
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 4:16 PM, t. whid email.t.w...@gmail.com wrote:
very relevant:
i feel like i'm voting for nader all over again ;)
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 7:17 PM, Michael Sullivan sullele...@gmail.comwrote:
ah man! they removed the video element from latest draft?
i'll have to read up on this later.
that's annoying news. hopefully the browsers keep supporting it
ah man! they removed the video element from latest draft?
i'll have to read up on this later.
that's annoying news. hopefully the browsers keep supporting it though.
No, the video element still exists. But the standards body is not
recommending a specific codec that will be standard. So each
i see. ok.
A codec agnostic implementation of the *video* tag is next to worthless. A
simple javaScript
libraryhttp://metavid.ucsc.edu/blog/2007/06/07/html5-video-the-future-is-now/could
accomplish the same thing. Codec agnostic video tag represents no
significant difference from the
A codec agnostic implementation of the *video* tag is next to worthless. A
simple javaScript
libraryhttp://metavid.ucsc.edu/blog/2007/06/07/html5-video-the-future-is-now/could
accomplish the same thing. Codec agnostic video tag represents no
significant difference from the object/embed tags
