[videoblogging] Re: Other People's Videos

2006-03-26 Thread Melanie Morgan
Thanks for the input guys! To Steve, Keep in mind that some creators don't want you to host their video on  your site because they are counting on traffic to their site to get  viewer counts and ad views, while others pay for bandwidth and more  views cost them money. I'm actually aware of

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Other People's Videos

2006-03-26 Thread Halcyon Lujah
This is a very interesting topic... If you open up your content to free syndication, how much control can you retain? In the friendly blogroll sense, it can be governed by netiquette and friendly emails. But can that scale? I have experience in the adult web world where appropriating content

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Other People's Videos

2006-03-26 Thread Eddie Codel
On Sun, Mar 26, 2006 at 12:24:58PM -0500, Melanie Morgan wrote: I'd be interested in what Geek Entertainment TV thinks of the method? you used to post one of their interviews. http://www.newmediacollective.org/2006/03/ sxsw2006_blogging_while_black.html Looks like you

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Other People's Videos

2006-03-26 Thread Melanie Morgan
Thanks Eddie for the feedback. FYI: I actually had linked to your original post as well as to the site in the credit line. The permalink's located on the date (March 19, 2006). Since I had the site link in the entry text already, I removed it from the credit line and just kept the permalink.

[videoblogging] Re: Other People's Videos

2006-03-26 Thread Melanie Morgan
There's a handful of people out there that republish our stuff without regard for attribution and linkbacks. In terms of attribution and linkbacks, I'm a firm believer in The Golden Rule. Just good karma. However, like you said, it's all about folks finding your site regardless. Your site