Re: [videoblogging] Re: YouTube terms

2005-08-10 Thread Chris Baudry
Hi Michael: Freevlog.org is great and helpful. I went to Graymattergravy too and wanted to view the video... but just got a bunch of garbage signs in a pop up window. Is it me? Christian On 8/9/05, Michael Verdi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But why would you live with giving away those rights

Re: [videoblogging] Re: YouTube terms

2005-08-09 Thread Michael Verdi
But why would you live with giving away those rights to YouTube when you can just upload via Ourmeida or Blip and just have them respect the CC license? -- Verdi http://michaelverdi.com http://freevlog.org http://graymattergravy.com On Aug 8, 2005, at 5:01 PM, David Meade wrote: --- In

Re: [videoblogging] Re: YouTube terms

2005-08-09 Thread R. Kristiansen
On 8/9/05, Michael Verdi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But why would you live with giving away those rights to YouTube when you can just upload via Ourmeida or Blip and just have them respect the CC license? This is a central question. For me, Blip.tv or my own server space will mostly suffice,

[videoblogging] Re: YouTube terms

2005-08-09 Thread t.whid
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, R. Kristiansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 8/9/05, Michael Verdi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But why would you live with giving away those rights to YouTube when you can just upload via Ourmeida or Blip and just have them respect the CC license? I

[videoblogging] Re: YouTube terms

2005-08-09 Thread David Meade
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Michael Verdi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But why would you live with giving away those rights to YouTube when you can just upload via Ourmeida or Blip and just have them respect the CC license? -- Verdi well, ** I ** wouldn't - thus my concerns which

[videoblogging] Re: YouTube terms

2005-08-09 Thread johngaltsjournal
That's what I've been trying to figure out all along... maybe people like the quick flash download and not-that-good sound? I'm still waiting for somebody to tell me why YouTube is good. I just dont get it. schlomo http://schlomolog.blogspot.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com,

Re: [videoblogging] Re: YouTube terms

2005-08-09 Thread Michael Sullivan
youtube is yahoo, right? it looks like yahoo, and i thought i read somewhere that it is a yahoo experiment. no? if not, are they affiliated with yahoo? and if so, will yahoo absorb youtube eventually? ok, i should do the right thing and read the archives here... -- sull- - - - - - - - - - - -

Re: [videoblogging] Re: YouTube terms

2005-08-09 Thread Jay dedman
youtube is yahoo, right? it looks like yahoo, and i thought i read somewhere that it is a yahoo experiment. no? if not, are they affiliated with yahoo? and if so, will yahoo absorb youtube eventually? ok, i should do the right thing and read the archives here... its unclear to me.

Re: [videoblogging] Re: YouTube terms

2005-08-08 Thread Andreas Haugstrup
On Mon, 08 Aug 2005 22:26:57 +0200, James A. Donnelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: copyright The content on the YouTube Website, including without limitation the text, software, graphics, photos, and videos (?Content?), is owned by or licensed to YouTube, subject to copyright and other