On Mon, 15 Aug 2005 17:33:27 +0200, Kunga [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But do sources and storage facilities of feeds like FireAnt,
ourmedia.org, archive.org and iTunes use this imbedded metadata for
keywords that one might use in a Search? I don't think so right?
I don't know who uses what.
Thanks for the heads up on the size of my sig. I just changed to
plain text. I was set to compose rich which was not my intention. Is
this better?
This metadata thing is huge for me because I find myself spending as
much time typing metadata in different fields as I do shooting,
editing
I noticed that after I add the metadata I have to save what was a
example.mp4 movie to a example.mov file type. Why is that? It
still looks the same.
k
http://feeds.feedburner.com/FutureMedia Now Syndicated on the World
Wide Web. Add us to your iTunes 4.9 Podcasts playlist today by
On Mon, 15 Aug 2005 18:20:56 +0200, Kunga [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Regarding the Show Movie Properties entry dialog box. Can only the
author change those? What's to keep anyone from changing all that
after they save a download?
Certainly anyone with Quicktime Pro can change those
On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 02:31:42 +0200, Adrian Miles
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
my own view is that outside of system level data
(date/time/size/format and so on) structured metadata a la semantic
web model will die the death of a thousand cuts. folksonomies are
more usable and robust and have
around the 16/8/05 Andreas Haugstrup mentioned about Re:
[videoblogging] Video Metadata / Derivative Works that:
For title, author and copyright info as well? I'd hate to have my
copyright notice defined by the community. :o)
no, these are in what I lazily called system level. You write
