I can't recall having that kind of problem with Quicktime. Most of my
recent projects that involved Quicktime/SMIL/Firefox on Windows have
done fine. Sometimes better than the results on the Mac.
Like you, I work with Java a lot and have done a bunch of JMF work.
I've also done some Quick
for me, it was strictly a firefox related issue... eventually, i get it working but each time, i am not even sure which step that i took resolved it :-/ this occurred even with embedded player plugin so it is not fast start related.
i think it is either codec related or mime type related and so
Good god. I have no idea what to do about any of this.I've tested QT plugins on various flavors of windows over the last few years, in IE and FireFox, and they've worked.I don't know.Are you aware of the problem IE has in not immediately playing QT files if they are not embedded in an html file,
On 11/9/05, Michael Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
One thing I have noticed when working on windows machines that needs
quicktime... and using firefox. After QT is installed, firefox tends to
have problems playing some QT media and wants to download
updates but usually fails. This has ha
forgot to add link:http://www.rssowl.org/it handles enclosures, but no media player. and yes, I/ON is very nice and open source. sull
On 11/8/05, Michael Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
check RSSOWL tooOn 11/8/05, Michael Shipp <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Digital wrote:>Hey Folks ->>We've
One thing I have noticed when working on windows machines that needs quicktime... and using firefox. After QT is installed, firefox tends to have problems playing some QT media and wants to download updates but usually fails. This has happened to be on about 4 or 5 diff puters over past sever
Lucas Gonze wrote:
>On 11/8/05, Michael Shipp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>Flash gets mentioned because the penetration rate is somewhere around
>>97% of all web browsers. Most likely, any web-based aggregators will go
>>with Flash for video.
>>
>>
>>
>I/ON looked quite cool when I sa
On 11/8/05, Michael Shipp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Flash gets mentioned because the penetration rate is somewhere around
> 97% of all web browsers. Most likely, any web-based aggregators will go
> with Flash for video.
>
> On the other hand, Java's penatration rate within browsers is unknown
>
check RSSOWL tooOn 11/8/05, Michael Shipp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Digital wrote:>Hey Folks ->>We've been talking about ease of use in aggregation and I keep hearing>about Flash. Isn't there an open source solution like java that can do>this? I would think the install base should be the same o
Digital wrote:
>Hey Folks -
>
>We've been talking about ease of use in aggregation and I keep hearing
>about Flash. Isn't there an open source solution like java that can do
>this? I would think the install base should be the same or larger than
>a closed system like Flash.
>
>If anyone knows of a
Hey Folks -
We've been talking about ease of use in aggregation and I keep hearing
about Flash. Isn't there an open source solution like java that can do
this? I would think the install base should be the same or larger than
a closed system like Flash.
If anyone knows of a java converter/viewer,
11 matches
Mail list logo
