Re: [videoblogging] Re: legal rights of copyrighted material

2006-01-24 Thread Jen Simmons
On Jan 19, 2006, at 9:50 AM, David Howell wrote: How about the rebroadcasting of video? I see this time and time again online where someone has captured something off the television, or downloaded it from somewhere and then slapped it up on their website. Case and point,

Re: [videoblogging] Re: legal rights of copyrighted material

2006-01-20 Thread Jen Simmons
On Jan 19, 2006, at 6:53 PM, Andreas Haugstrup wrote: that's why I keep  recommending college text books on mass media law and not just a website  with bullet points about Fair Use. Just to be clear -- the website I recommended at: is not just a website with bullet points... in fact I

Re: [videoblogging] Re: legal rights of copyrighted material

2006-01-20 Thread Andreas Haugstrup
On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 14:28:36 +0100, Jen Simmons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Jan 19, 2006, at 6:53 PM, Andreas Haugstrup wrote: that's why I keep  recommending college text books on mass media law and not just a website  with bullet points about Fair Use. Just to be clear -- the website

Re: [videoblogging] Re: legal rights of copyrighted material

2006-01-19 Thread Andreas Haugstrup
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 13:35:58 +0100, Crystal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Okay but how about Music? If I publish lets say stillshots with background music of my favorite artist that goes along with the pictures...and I have the CD so its not like I stole it off the net. Republish on the net...so

Re: [videoblogging] Re: legal rights of copyrighted material

2006-01-19 Thread Jen Simmons
Yes, in my rant I was being completely U.S.-centric without acknowledging it... (very american). I apologize. Thanks for letting us know about copyright law are Australia. Anyone else?? Other places?? This does bring up interesting points -- the internet is global, so how does the law or

Re: [videoblogging] Re: legal rights of copyrighted material

2006-01-19 Thread Jen Simmons
On Jan 19, 2006, at 7:35 AM, Crystal wrote: Okay but how about Music? If I publish lets say stillshots with background music of my favorite artist that goes along with the pictures...and I have the CD so its not like I stole it off the net. Republish on the net...so every can see it. But

RE: [videoblogging] Re: legal rights of copyrighted material

2006-01-19 Thread Mrs. Ours MA PLPC
and mother of fourI'm probably safe enough being honestly dishonest? Okay.. That's all I got The end From: Ms. Kitka [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com Subject: [videoblogging] Re: legal rights of copyrighted material Date: Thu, 19

Re: [videoblogging] Re: legal rights of copyrighted material

2006-01-19 Thread Andreas Haugstrup
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 14:28:16 +0100, Jen Simmons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks for letting us know about copyright law are Australia. Anyone else?? Other places?? The basics of Copyright are covered in the Berne Convention. These basics are shared by the 160 countries who have agreed to

Re: [videoblogging] Re: legal rights of copyrighted material

2006-01-19 Thread Andreas Haugstrup
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 18:11:00 +0100, Carl Weaver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And who is in the video doesn't have anything to do with it. The copyright is owned by the person or company that created the piece. Just like the copyright of a portrait I shoot as a photographer is owned by me,

Re: [videoblogging] Re: legal rights of copyrighted material

2006-01-18 Thread Kath O'Donnell
Jen, I'm guessing you live in USA?just for info for any Aussies on the list who haven't already seen this, here's a fair use - myths misconceptions document from Australian Copyright Centre ( http://www.copyright.org.au ) as there are some differences between Aus US