(late reply)
I think one day people will be shooting / making video / media as stringers
and sell that to people who need video / media, likely businesses who can
afford to pay. another layer to news program's stringers/freelancers but on
any topic, not just news. ala Neal Stephenson's Snow
oh, also, which is why I think ads on videos is an old media way of
thinking. like ads on tv. (which will phase into product placements
soon enough). people will still use them now whilst they make money
from them but I don't think they'll be necessary or used in future as
they'll be regarded as
@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Chuck
Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2007 10:29 AM
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [videoblogging] Re: the ugly truth about online video
This made me recall what Bill Gates said back in January:
http://newteevee. http://newteevee.com
Hey Bill,
Long time no see. How's it going?
On Aug 2, 2007, at 3:29 PM, Bill Cammack wrote:
I seriously don't know why people expect videos about uninteresting
(except to the audience of ten) topics to EVER be monetized.
sometimes things are of interest to an audience larger than
That's a zillion times *more* interesting than most monetized video.
Brook
On 8/2/07, pouringdownpix [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
never YET? never EVER?
uninteresting videoblog monetized, if only for a moment:
http://pouringdown.tv/?p=161
--
daniel, pouringdown.tv
--
