Re: [videoblogging] Re: WebM Project

2010-05-29 Thread Rupert Howe
Just catching up after week away, reading the various breakdowns speculations. So WebM only matches h.264 baseline profile for quality, and is bulkier and slower and uses more power? But surely the point is that this is just the beginning of an open development process? And isn't the

Re: [videoblogging] Re: WebM Project

2010-05-29 Thread Jay dedman
Re full page video: Odd how few cool tools have been made with HTML5 video so far.  It'll be interesting to see what the HTML5 version of Navigaya.com looks like, which they say is coming soon.  Recently launched as Flash only - nice full page video/web TV, social media browsing interface -

Re: [videoblogging] Digest Number 5846

2010-05-29 Thread WGBH LAB
The Antiques Roadshow Open Call has been extended through Memorial Day Weekend, until June 1st. You can submit, comment, and rate antique videos at: http://lab.wgbh.org.roadshow . Thank you again for contacting the WGBH Lab. We will return your message shortly. On May 29, 2010, at 10:10

Re: [videoblogging] Re: WebM Project

2010-05-29 Thread Michael Sullivan
Not familiar with navigaya.com. Dont see info on site and requires login to go deeper but no signup. Care to elaborate? On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 7:12 AM, Rupert Howe rup...@twittervlog.tv wrote: Just catching up after week away, reading the various breakdowns speculations. So WebM only

Re: [videoblogging] Re: WebM Project

2010-05-29 Thread Rupert Howe
If you can get past the presenter's weird boob jiggling, this demo video shows it off quite well: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4lp8aMhluDs It's a closed, walled-garden Flash deal. More like a set top box interface. But pretty and full of features - more on the way. Will be interesting