Re: [videoblogging] Re: pointing feed to a blogger page vs. web-page?

Sure, you can use things other than blogger.  Lots of people use word press and it's a really nice blogging tool you can use on your own site.  It (and other blogging apps) will generally generate your RSS feed for you as well. As for embeding the video to be played within the webpage, there are

Re: [videoblogging] feedburner media urls with ?d=

On 3/16/06, Joshua Kinberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Could you give me a RSS URL that uses this? I have never encountered this issue here. We should still be able todownload the files using that URL convention.My feed recently updated to this sytesm: http://www.davidmeade.com/feedOn 3/16/06, Mi

Re: [videoblogging] feedburner media urls with ?d=

Well, on one hand ...    If I were feedburner I probably would have put &filename=origional_file.mov at the end. Just make sure they werent going to break any systems already in place.  I agree with you there, it seems a simple safe guard for backward compatability. On the other hand ...   They'

Re: [videoblogging] feedburner media urls with ?d=

On 3/16/06, Michael Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: but i'll try to get http library implemented.  know of any good php for this?  forgive me if this isn't what you were asking for ... but here's some php anyway :-Pcheck out:  http://davidmeade.com/resources/enclosure_test.php and put in

Re: [videoblogging] Seeking Advice Re: Tracking iTunes Video Podcast Downloads

Yes they do now.  Feed burner recently added an ability to track downloads.  Essentially they're traching clickthroughs on the enclosure link itself. This is quite handy if your hosting the files at a service who cant provide you this sort of data. I've turned on the new feature (its included

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Week of Vlogging Dangerously

so we have two simultaneous events now? Vlog week and for bonus points ... make 'em dangerous? =P... I'm gonna try to do this too.On 3/31/06, Stephanie Bryant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 3/31/06, Richard Show <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:>  First of all, wasn't 3rd - 9th the original plan?>

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Vlog Week 2006!! April 3-9!!!

This is what tagging it will do.  It will allow us to get them all in one place/listing/feedOn 3/31/06, Casey McKinnon < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:But the question is: where do we post our content?  It would be nice if we could all post it ourselves on the same blog... I know itpossible to progra

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Week of Vlogging Dangerously

> Hey! What would we link these to? A technorati search?that or mefeedia?  http://mefeedia.com/tags/videobloggingweek2006/ SPONSORED LINKS Individual Fireant

Re: [videoblogging] Productive Member of the Group

ok starting over ...I dont think I 'get it'.  This is a group where we would announce updates?  I really would hate having to do that ... my feed does that for me ... epecially if its geared toward daily producers - can't we just assume then that theres an update, or even better ... subscribe to

Re: [videoblogging] big announcement

Wow Congratulations Peter!!  What great evidence of all the hard work you've put into MeFeedia!  I cant wait to hear the details.  Sounds like you'll still be involved with it, so that's great. congrats!   - Dave http://www.davidmeade.comOn 4/1/06, Peter Van Dijck <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:I

Re: [videoblogging] big announcement

bah!On 4/1/06, Peter Van Dijck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: OK I told myself the first person who mentiones the date - that's whenI fess up.April's fool. Mefeedia hasn't been acquired by anyone.I laughed a lot though. Quite a few people sent me privatecongratulatory emails, and were really surpris

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Week of Vlogging Dangerously/VlogWeek2006

k stomaches. ;) > >> > CURRENT PARTICIPANTS:> > We'll have a single page feed for all of these, as soon as it's set up> > (working on it). If you're participating but absolutely don't want to> > be in a web-based feed, let me know. > >> >

Re: [videoblogging] New macs will run XP

I saw your first post, Kunga, but I didn't catch why running windows in a virtual machine is "INFERIOR and much more dangerous" than booting it natively .. care to explain?On 4/6/06, Kunga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Obolete info. The real news is that you can run Windows INSIDE OS X.You just ha

Re: [videoblogging] New macs will run XP

to use. On 4/6/06, David Meade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I saw your first post, Kunga, but I didn't catch why running windows in a virtual machine is "INFERIOR and much more dangerous" than booting it natively .. care to explain? On 4/6/06, Kunga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w

Re: [videoblogging] Re: New macs will run XP

I admit that being able to toggle back and forth is nice ... but ... if the VM app works like ones I have used in the windows world ... with this application your windows system would exist as a bunch of files within the MAC OS file system ... if yout MAC OS ever got hosed you'd lose the Window

Re: [videoblogging] If your content is on Veoh** was: Veoh transcoding feeds?

On 4/7/06, Michael Sullivan < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:    opt-in CAN have these checks and balances though. i've waited to see if an open submission system would be problematic, and if so, a simple trigger would force a typical member activation process.  but no need yet.I agree ...  I'm fine

Re: [videoblogging] Stress level 10

Ahck I wondered what happened to your site once when I tried to go there and couldnt get it to load. That sucks man, sorry.  I'll re-visit later tonight. :-) - Dave-- http://www.DavidMeade.comfeed:  http://www.DavidMeade.com/feed YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS  Visit your group "vid

Re: [videoblogging] Re: massive infringement (was: Veoh Transcoding Feeds...)

On 4/8/06, hpbatman7 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: What I don't get and maybe someone can explain this to me in a simplemanner, (I am not a real tech guy, I know enough and am learning buton a thread like this I realize how much I don't know.) I put myvideos out, what is to stop someone from puttin

Re: [videoblogging] Veoh ** Simple message

But Charles they aren't caching.  Caching is keeping a copy of an object to make new requests for it faster. They are hosting derivative works.  The work was downloaded.  Transcoded to a new format.  And that completely new format is HOSTED (not cached) at a new location. Requests for this new o

Re: [videoblogging] Simple Question

well I guess I havent taken any action yet because I for one want to give them a chance to fix the problem.As for wha VEOH's done in the past ... there's been a few full appologies, and a promise to make it right.  I'm not sure what more we could possibly ask for. I'm not going to 'claim' it bec

Re: [videoblogging] Is it Fair Use to link directly to a vlog's video?

Well I think its important to remember the difference between an individual who is linking in order to 'revlog' somehting he enjoied and a comercial site linking so as to gain traffic / members.But as an individual ... sure I think it's ok so long as you obey the copyright. When I revlog here's

Re: [videoblogging] Is it Fair Use to link directly to a vlog's video?

Yeah the creative commons license can be inserted into the feed at both the channel and the item level. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/creativeCommons:license>(namespace: http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule)On 4/10/06, Devlon <[EMAIL

Re: [videoblogging] Is it Fair Use to link directly to a vlog's video?

On 4/10/06, Charles Iliya Krempeaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:   Although asking is always nice  I think it's important, especially on the web, to have automated ways of doing all this.  (Like the way Creative Commons automates things.)  Or else, it's just not scalable for example, how

Re: [videoblogging] Is it Fair Use to link directly to a vlog's video?

On 4/10/06, Charles Iliya Krempeaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The problem is that, from a specification point of view, the licensing in plain old RSS (without any extensions) is NOT meant to be machine readable.  (Note, what I'm talking about here is the RSS element.) And a valid RSS reader do

Re: [videoblogging] Veoh transcoding feeds?

On 4/10/06, Devlon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I can't right now, but I guess one could find out from the creative commons site what they define a derivation as. "Derivative Work" means a work based upon the Work or upon the Work and other pre-existing works, such as a translation, musical arr

Re: [videoblogging] Veoh transcoding feeds?

"or any other form in which the Work may be recast, transformed, or adapted, " sounds like transcoding to me.to my mind this does require permission.  It changes the nature of the media.  For example if I create an interactive quicktime movie, just  trancoding it to flash will remove the interac

Re: [videoblogging] Veoh transcoding feeds?

On 4/10/06, Andreas Haugstrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I don't agree with Devlon that a video transcode constitutes a derrivativework (IANAL!!!). Just as a xerox of a photo is a "copy" not a derrivativework... It's a bad copy, but still a copy. IMO. This from the champion of interactive bloggy

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Looking for a "good" camera

I also have the PV-GS150, and really like it.  It's got a mic port and a mount for accessories.As Blips says the mic that comes with it has a fairly short cord, but you can plug any mic in you want. - Dave-- http://www.DavidMeade.comfeed:  http://www.DavidMeade.com/feed YAHOO! G

Re: [videoblogging] Newbie with a question...

Actually I'm pretty sure that camera saves files in an MJPEG format.  They'd be AVI files, however not all software comes with MJPEG codecs.  Sony Vegas for example does not.Movie Maker does however ... hmmm Are trying to actually "open" the file, or are you importing the files into your collect

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Newbie with a question...

Yeah what Gena said.  The windows Media PLYER never gives me a reliable screenshot of the movie ... however Movie MAKER can do it.  I have windows Movie Maker version 2.1 and it will save a JPG image of the movie directly.  I just hit the "Take Picture" button and it asks me where I want to save

Re: [videoblogging] another FAQ from a newbie

Well I'll make the disclaimer up front:  It depends on your budget but ... If you want to go with a real video camera (instead of a digital still camera that also takes videos), you'll get better quality video (and likely sound). If you can afford a 3CCD camera, they are usually somewhat

Re: [videoblogging] why you now have an error on all your pages

I though this was a security issue?  It's a royalty thing!?  I didnt think the quicktime plugin was an active-x control ... does this impact quicktime embeds? ... uhg Im so confused.I've not noticed any pop-ups on my site yet. On 4/15/06, Ryan Ozawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGN

Re: [videoblogging] Re: why you now have an error on all your pages

well my embeds are written by a _javascript_ onclick event ... perhaps thats enough to avoid the problem? I tried loading it up in a patched up version of IE7 and so far I havent gotten an alert.On 4/15/06, andrew michael baron < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hmmm, curious, the scripts you are poi

Re: [videoblogging] help with very slow site

It's slow for me too. (WinXP w/ FireFox)On 4/16/06, Richard Show <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: A month or so ago I spent a really long time changing my site to wordpress.Lots of time it takes the main page forever to load, and/or, if you click on "next" or "previous", or if you click on a catego

Re: [videoblogging] the activex/eolas patent bug in Explorer

well pop-ups that pop-up because the user clicked a link wont be blocked, so we're ok there. I'd imagine the _javascript_ thing can use custom poster frames no problem.  I'm not using Enric's but rather one I wrote, and it works fine with whatever poster frame I want to use.  I've also played a

Re: [videoblogging] the activex/eolas patent bug in Explorer

doesnt happen on my site (http://www.davidmeade.com )  On 4/16/06, Ryan Ozawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 4/16/06, David Meade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> well pop-ups that pop-up because the user clicked a link wont be blocked, so we're ok there. Thanks, David. I hope this is the cas

Re: [videoblogging] the activex/eolas patent bug in Explorer

any of the archive pages.  for example: http://mortaine.blogspot.com/2005_07_13_mortaine_archive.html On 4/16/06, Devlon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 4/16/06, David Meade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: well maybe I'm not understanding the use of "poster frame"

Re: [videoblogging] Re: why you now have an error on all your pages

I have a lightweight JS function I use, and fast start works just fine. The user has to click the poster frame to start the video, but at that point the embed is created and fast start .. starts ... no need to wait for download. http://www.davidmeade.comOn 4/16/06, andrew michael baron <[EMAIL

Re: [videoblogging] the activex/eolas patent bug in Explorer

I see no problem.  I expected the windows update I just received to have the 'fix' for IE in it? On 4/16/06, David Meade < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: any of the archive pages.  for example: http://mortaine.blogspot.com/2005_07_13_mortaine_archive.html On 4/16/06, Devlon <[EMA

Re: [videoblogging] Re: why you now have an error on all your pages

On 4/16/06, Stephanie Bryant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I wanted a "you go to my site andclick play to play" interface. Microsoft has completely killed that asan option. Completely. I'm not sure this is true.  On my site, when a user clicks (a false) play button, the embed suddenly appears and

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Embed vs. Pop-Up

Generally requested "pop-ups" are allowed with anything not just Firefox.  its only the pop-ups that happen without the user clicking a link that are blocked.  If your browser isn't opening a link you click, you have pretty big issues. It's possible however if the pop-up page is done with JS (as

Re: [videoblogging] Reltag support

Thats awesome.  Will it also tag posts with the item's elements in the feed?  I typically rely on these for technorati tagging.On 4/18/06, Peter Van Dijck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi all,From today, Mefeedia supports the rel=tag standard.This means that you can put tags in your blogpost, and

Re: [videoblogging] Reltag support

day of coding and I don't have time right now, gottafinish some consulting work :)Not to say we won't, if I find some time I might implement that. Cheers!PeterOn 4/18/06, David Meade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:>  Thats awesome.  Will it also tag posts with the item's elem

Re: [videoblogging] Reltag support

Yeah they arent really the same thing.  All the ways they are different hit you when you try to code around them.  I've treated them mostly the same on my site, but have found myself very limited at times because of it.  I've often wished I'd written my system differently so that it made clear w

Re: [videoblogging] Reltag support

tension is ever actuall designed. :-POn 4/18/06, Charles Iliya Krempeaux < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello,On 4/18/06, David Meade < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Yeah they arent really the same thing.  All the ways they are different hit you when you try to code around them.  I've tr

Re: [videoblogging] Reltag support

rvices that consume RSS and also have tagging to support relTag. -JoshOn 4/18/06, David Meade < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: perhaps but doesnt HREF actuall mean "hypertext reference" ... this wouldnt be a html doc, and would have to point to one (maybe it points to anohter xml doc)UR

Re: [videoblogging] Reltag support

On 4/18/06, Charles Iliya Krempeaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: All you need from the Human-Computer Interface is some way of "following" links. I guess my question here is (and I ask only because you've got me thinking =P) ... HTML is a mark up language.  It comes with rules (or at least unive

Re: [videoblogging] Reltag support

item?  For this, you'd need a tag element in rss On 4/18/06, Andreas Haugstrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tue, 18 Apr 2006 19:50:00 +0200, David Meade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:> Not to get too far off topic here but the more I think about a tag> extension > to rss the

Re: [videoblogging] Reltag support

e: Yeah, if you're a spammer. :o)- AndreasOn Tue, 18 Apr 2006 21:49:05 +0200, David Meade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:> well I guess because then its dependant on the feed to include the entire > post body.  Not all feeds do that and in some cases you wouldnt want them> to.  Wouldnt ther

Re: [videoblogging] How to capture Windows Media Player video screenshot

yeah this is thanks to how windows media player works ... something about it displaying directly to the hardware ... I dunnoThe bottom line (I think) is that WMP isn't gonna cut it.  The most reliable way I've found is to open the video in Windows Movie Maker and useing the lil button to take a

Re: [videoblogging] Re: How to capture Windows Media Player video screenshot

The porblem, mgmoon, is that with windows/windows media player (at least on many if not most) systems is that once you take the screen capture you cant really use it.  The captured cannot be placed in a window which is at a different pixel location from the origional.  The pasted image never mov

Re: [videoblogging] Re: How to capture Windows Media Player video screenshot

I add fake play buttons too :-P   http://www.davidmeade.com/Pics/vid_controls.gif On 4/19/06, Andreas Haugstrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Wed, 19 Apr 2006 22:35:45 +0200, mgmoon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> Problem I see, it looks just like a picture and doesn't give any> indication that if

[videoblogging] SMIL in QT10

So QuickTime has supported SMIL since version 4, but I cannot get version 10 to open a SMIL file. At one point QT10 even told me I had to install QT7 in order to open the file. Has apple dropped support for this standard? - Dave [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [videoblogging] SMIL in QT10

me X would be an understatement. > > Nevertheless, don't expect Apple to rush forward foolishly. > Duplicating the functionality of a continually developed, 18-year-old > API will not happen overnight. It will take years, and it will be even > longer before every important Mac OS X applica

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Serious Magic and Vlogit!

You  can view wmvs on mac (although some have told me that the wmv player for Mac is crap).   WMVs are not bad, it's just that the platform tries very hard to keep the user out of the guts of the video ... You can however, for example, download the WM Encoder tool and play around with the compre

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Comment Response

Many do.   My system only sends the "A new reply has been posted" message to people who are registered users.  :(   To combat this gap and allow for notifying guest users, I'm going to (hopefully this weekend) start publishing the RSS feed for the comments/replies themselves to any given topic.

Re: [videoblogging] videoblogs.com

I don't know much about this site but it looks like it's just loading your page in a lower frame which should still register as the end user in your stats ...   They are using a redirect in the lower frame, but unless they are doing somehting really funky like being some kind of http proxy (whi

Re: [videoblogging] Mid America Meet the Vloggers in Chicago!

Woo Hoo!    "My Kind of Town "  On 10/5/05, Richard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The Meet the Vloggers in Mid America is officially on Place: Chicago Apple Store (North Michigan Avenue) Date: Saturday, November 19Time: 6:30pmPresenters: Josh Leo, David Meade, Richard H

Re: [videoblogging] Independent World Television

Hmm. looks like a pretty cool site, Adam.  Are you involved with the IWT project?   I'm wondering things like "will each program have an RSS feed so that I can download them in ant and watch them on my own schedule rather than a set programming schedule"  and "how would each episode be licensed?

Re: [videoblogging] Fwd: [cc-info] CC in Review: Lawrence Lessig on Supporting the Commons

cc anual fall fund raiser ... sounds like a great use for the rel=payment tag! :-) The fund raiser page seems to be down atm, however. a href="" href="http://creativecommons.org/support/">http://creativecommons.org/support/" rel="payment" title="Support Creative Commons"-- http://www.DavidMea

Re: [videoblogging] Pete Prodoehl and Josh Kenberg

If you want a web based aggrigator, check out MeFeedia.com.  Peter Vandijck's got some good stuff going there. I do really like that interface of the link you provided, but Ant's huge value is it's downloading/syncing.  Seems to make more sense to request this sort of feature from MeFeedia whic

Re: [videoblogging] Go put Rocketboom in the new "google reader"

I put my feed into it and it was very nice indeed.  It even recognized my enclosure tags. my feed:  http://www.davidmeade.com/post/post_archive.php?tag=Video+Blog&feed=1 On 10/7/05, aroundtheperimeter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I did a search on rocketboom and just text came up. could you imagi

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Pete Prodoehl and Josh Kenberg

On 10/7/05, aroundtheperimeter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Also to convince my friends to watch video it would be easier to tellthem to go to this link "www.example.c" then to tell them to downloadfireant.  Just seems like people want instant gratification (you say whats  a 2 minute download...on

Re: [videoblogging] re: The backend

I'm actually using phpBB which I've heavily modified to both do vlog stuff and publish outside of the phpbb pages.  Basically its just a mysql database and php pages, but I'm using the phpBB user/permission stuff.   I had to create the vlog/tag/rss features though.   - Dave http://www.davidmead

Re: [videoblogging] Multi-Linking Blip.tv and OurMedia Together

Justin -    Interesting idea, but I for one would not want to use a link that requires the viewer to install software.   However this could probably be done on a server side solution - it could work alot like the tinyurl service except that the server has a 1-many rather than 1 to one map for ur

Re: [videoblogging] Not a videoblog, a 'signlog'!

Hi Brein -  Maybe you could partner with one of the hosting options that are poping up.  A few of them are experimenting with ways to let users record the video directly from a webcam to the website (or upload one naturally).    If you could find such a service, you could probably convince the

Re: [videoblogging] how do you feel about video popping up in a new window?

I use a pop-up for my embeded player.  I do it for the following reasons:   * I (and I've found most of my viewers) find it really annoying when they click "play" (or whatever) and some media player takes the webpage away and brings up a player I have to sit with while things stream/download and

Re: [videoblogging] Re: how do you feel about video popping up in a new window?

On 10/11/05, Richard Bennett-Forrest <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: What I was referring to, is that HTML is structural and contextualmark up, and individual visual user agents (web browsers) are mostly free to display HTML however they wish. The point being, publishersprovide the data, and the user

Re: [videoblogging] how do you feel about video popping up in a new window?

On 10/11/05, Pete Prodoehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Some of us believe in user-centered design.   As do I.  My point was that we dont get to say "users perfer this because I do".  I'm using a new window for my videos because my experience with USERS is that that is what they prefer.  I have a

Re: [videoblogging] last two hours....

On 10/11/05, culturalfarmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Few vlogs communicate to me on any level justvisual babbling.  It concerns me that so little thought goes into concept, content, and craft.  I LOVE the FUN, community, part of vlogging.      Well I try to observe a very distinct differe

[videoblogging] WordPress Auto-enclosures fix

FYI, for those of you who use wordpress and want to use it's automatic enclosure feature, but have found you cannot because your hosting service issues a redirect to the media file (most of them do this I believe), I've tweaked the code a bit to work with redirects.   http://www.davidmeade.com/

Re: [videoblogging] Re: WordPress Auto-enclosures fix

itchen.com--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Lucas Gonze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:>> Are there still podcatchers which don't handle redirects?  Thatseems insane. >> On 10/18/05, David Meade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> >> > FYI, for those of you who use wordpress and wa

Re: [videoblogging] Re: WordPress Auto-enclosures fix

On 10/18/05, wazman_au <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Just on the point of hand-coding the feed:Since I'm doing this, is it possible for me to have one version of avideo at the website, another in the feed? Yeah, if you want to control which media files are in the feed, you'll want to manually enter

Re: [videoblogging] Re: WordPress Auto-enclosures fix

On 10/18/05, Steve Watkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Man this is vrey useful and of real value, cheers :) I encourage youto submit it to wordpress if you havent already.CheersSteve of Elbows Thanks ... I cant really figure out how to contact them :-P -- http://www.DavidMeade.com

Re: [videoblogging] embedding

In windows the easiest way is to open the file in a player. in Windows Media Player (for WMVs) you can then go to File->Properties in QuickTime Player (for MOVs and others) you can hit cntrl-i (There are ways to make WMVs display this information within the file directory view but it's dependa

Re: [videoblogging] WordPress Auto-enclosures fix

Well the code I wrote only follows one link, but I could modify it to follow up to two ...   In the meantime I'll see if I can figure out how to register for that trac website and send them what I have. :-)   Thanks,   Dave-- http://www.DavidMeade.com   On 10/19/05, Pete Prodoehl <[EMAIL PROTECT

Re: [videoblogging] NYTimes article: "An iPod Worth Keeping an Eye On"

Oh man another term coined: "iPodvision" On 10/19/05, Jayme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: New York TimesOct 18, 2005An iPod Worth Keeping an Eye Onhttp://tinyurl.com/bvpm8 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-->Most low income households are not online. Help bridge t

Re: [videoblogging] this will blow your mind

I think Andreas was talking about the fact that all of those video comments are going to have to be hosted by the blog owner ... the blogger would have to provide hosing / bandwidth for it all. :-(  Maybe someday there will be a flash plugin like that which sends comments to blip.tv or audioblog

[videoblogging] 3ivx .mov Questions

All. I'm having a nightmare-ish time trying to get decent quicktime .MOVs created on my PC. I'll spare you the details but here are a few questions I have right at the moment ... I need to get 3ivx I think, but... 1) The 3ivx site still says it doesnt work with quicktime 7 for windows ..

Re: [videoblogging] Ourmedia status (was: "Weird OurMedia.org error message:)

On 10/23/05, Jay dedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: and my bias will be that dealing with .mov is always easier     *bangs head into desk*   I wish that were the case for me.  Trying to author MOVs in Windows is for me about the ugliest computer experience I've had recently ... either it doe

Re: [videoblogging] QuickTime (and anything else) can make small files

That remark was made in a comparison to ther file types.  The link you sent is very nice quality and all .. but its half the size of what we normall use on vlogs ... its appls and oranges. The question/concern was about how files (for videos of the same size/fps)  have such dratmatically differ

Re: [videoblogging] QuickTime (and anything else) can make small files

On 10/23/05, David Meade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The new tutorial you made fot 3ivx/MOV is really good and I'm still gonna try some new stuff ... but doing as it describes makes a .MOV files that is twice as large file size than the WMV of the same thing.  (the Mov did have bet

Re: [videoblogging] QuickTime (and anything else) can make small files

using 3ivx as per Verid's new tutorial video, my MOV files are fully twice the filesize as my WMV files.   The MOVs are slightly better quality ... but not so much so as to be worth 2x the file size IMHO.  I mean I'm still gonna have to find a way to do it as I want to be on the iPod ... but I j

Re: [videoblogging] QuickTime (and anything else) can make small files

size orthe quality.  I'm almost finished compressing some videos that are the same size but different quality. As Andreas has said, you can'tcompare apples to oranges.--Verdihttp://michaelverdi.com/ > http://freevlog.org/ >http://node101.org/ >On Oct 24, 2005, at 1:06 AM, David M

Re: [videoblogging] QuickTime (and anything else) can make small files

  On 10/24/05, Verdi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: If you want to do an experiment youhave to have a control.  In this case it would be the file size or the quality.     That's what I was trying to say ... the result I was talking about produced two files that seemed to have about the same qualit

Re: [videoblogging] Re: iPod reviews (& Mefeedia question)

On 10/25/05, Bill Streeter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Also if anyone wants to let me know how my stuff looks on their ipodlet me know. I'm pretty sure that it's going to be a while before I get one of my own. I just got a g4 ipod last winter.   According to FedEx mine is waiting for me at home!

Re: [videoblogging] PC Video Edititing Software

On 10/25/05, Christopher Bergeron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I've been thinking about Vegas Movie Studio from Sonybut   I purchased this last night and wish I hadnt.  I got the platnum edition even ... says it will open AVIs ... but it of course doesnt tell you that it cant import AVI files th

Re: [videoblogging] QuickTime (and anything else) can make small files

> On 10/25/05, Verdi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> The point of this discussion, for me,  was to point out> what I feel is an often repeated and unfair criticism of > QuickTime, by Windows users.  Namely, "you can't make > QuickTime clips as small as Windows Media." [is wrong] > On 10/24/05, Fran

Re: [videoblogging] PC Video Edititing Software

  On 10/25/05, Pete Prodoehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I assume your camera saves AVI files using Motion-JPEG (M-JPEG) right?On my Mac I can import AVI files using Motion-JPEG just fine into iMovie, and this is without QuickTime Pro. If you're using Windows,well, I don't have a solution... but

Re: [videoblogging] Re: iPod reviews (& Mefeedia question)

On 10/25/05, Bill Streeter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Also if anyone wants to let me know how my stuff looks on their ipodlet me know. IYour vlog looks great on the iPod bill!  I've got a short vlog up of my iPod playing one of your vlogs if you want to take a look.  Sadly my lil' digicam didnt

[videoblogging] One Click buttons

Hey all, has anyone else (windows users anyway) noticed that the pc iTunes one click button that everyone seems to be using (ala the meFeedia feature) doesnt work on the pc?   It doesnt for me anyway and I have iTunes.  When I click it, it send the file to iTunes, but then just displays the cont

Re: [videoblogging] One Click buttons

On 10/26/05, Markus Sandy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: works ok for me on mac and win xp on firefox Hmm...doesnt work for me.  I'm running winxp and firefox too.  I click it and it pops up the "open with?" dialog ... itunes is already selected.  I click ok and then the contents of that .pcast fil

Re: [videoblogging] Re: One Click buttons

On 10/26/05, Susan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Here's the itunes link I have on my page: http://phobos.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewPodcast?id=82308530(course the id number is my itunes podcast feed id)     Yeah the apple.com links work like a charm, but only those people who are list

Re: [videoblogging] Re: One Click buttons

On 10/26/05, Susan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Why not make an < a href > link, with text, to your feedburner feed,then explain to the person in a few words how to drag it into itunes and drop it where it says "podcasts"?  Easy cheesy.< a href = "" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/david-blah">h

Re: [videoblogging] Re: One Click buttons

On 10/26/05, Brad Webb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I wonder if maybe the difference is between fresh installations of>iTunes versus upgrades.  Maybe an upgrade to the version with >podcasting support didn't properly register the handler, while a>fresh installation would?>>This, I think, is the

Re: [videoblogging] One more attempt...a simple request...please

Hey Lynn ... Sorry I havent had time to check today, but FYI I'll take a look at them tonight.   - Dave http://www.davidmeade.com  On 10/26/05, Lynn Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello fellow vloggers.I posted this earlier but didn't get one response. I've only had myvlog up for short time but

Re: [videoblogging] Creative crisis (I'm stuck)

u dive in...Best,- Ted On 10/26/05, David Meade < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 10/25/05, Ted Tagami <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: http://www.nanowrimo.org/     Oh Man! I wish I hadnt ever seen that link that looks awesome and scary ... damn. hmm.   - Dave http://

Re: [videoblogging] One more attempt...a simple request...please

I really liked the vlog, Lynn! The vlogs left me hoping for another episode to dive deeper into the lives of whoever that episide was interviewing.  Cant wait to see the next theme you go after. - DaveOn 10/26/05, Lynn Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello fellow vloggers.I posted this earli

Re: [videoblogging] MP4 H.264

I can view this file in windows just fine.I'm using winXP and have QT 7 Pro installed on this pcOn 10/26/05, andrew michael baron < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:I'm in limbo on the H264/MP4 files (Steve). I recieved a copy of a the new Vegas app last month which isrecomended for making PSP files, bu

Re: [videoblogging] no enclosures

Josh ... I figured it out ... your MIME mention got me thinking and I checked something... It's the MP3 you have as an enclosure in your latest post. the Blip.TV server is returning it's content type as text/html; instead of: audio/mpeg When feed burner goes to check the content type isn't no

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   >