Re: [videoblogging] Feedburner is over, but

2009-01-21 Thread Roxanne Darling
Thanks Rupert. Shane handles this for us, but says he has not been notified either. Maybe that is in the works? Aloha, Rox On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 7:03 AM, David King davidleek...@gmail.com wrote: Mine's having problems. Looks like someone has set up a spam account on the new google

Re: [videoblogging] Feedburner is over, but

2009-01-20 Thread Richard (Show) Hall
thanks Rupert ... I just moved mine ... Richard On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 1:11 PM, Rupert rup...@fatgirlinohio.org wrote: It's a good thing. I was wondering why Google were keeping Feedburner separate - I thought it showed a lack of commitment. But badly handled. Seems like they're rushing

Re: [videoblogging] Feedburner is over, but

2009-01-20 Thread David King
Mine's having problems. Looks like someone has set up a spam account on the new google version of feedburner for davidleeking. I have emailed google twice - I'm guessing they are dealing with lots of emails about feedburner issues. I'm guessing it'll sort itself out eventually (and in the

[videoblogging] Feedburner is over, but

2009-01-19 Thread Jay dedman
seems to just turn into something else: https://www.google.com/support/feedburner/bin/answer.py?answer=126303 Our vision when FeedBurner joined Google was to help bring the best of what FeedBurner offered in syndication publisher tools and solutions to the AdSense platform, and vice versa. In

Re: [videoblogging] Feedburner is over, but

2009-01-19 Thread Rupert
It's a good thing. I was wondering why Google were keeping Feedburner separate - I thought it showed a lack of commitment. But badly handled. Seems like they're rushing to make changes and save costs. Only a month to transfer all your feeds? After February 28th, you won't be able to access

Re: [videoblogging] Feedburner is over, but

2009-01-19 Thread @sull
warnings of this have been posted here years ago ;) On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 2:11 PM, Rupert rup...@fatgirlinohio.org wrote: It's a good thing. I was wondering why Google were keeping Feedburner separate - I thought it showed a lack of commitment. But badly handled. Seems like they're