m4v is h264 in a mp4 container. So this discussion is really about mpeg4 vs h264 and the container format stuff cofuses the issue further.
Steve of Elbows --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Fri, 09 Dec 2005 17:40:05 +0100, Hal Goodtree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > OHMO, .mov is a better codec for vlogging than .m4v. The files are > > smaller, cleaner and more > > universally compatible than .m4v. Just got to set the parameters for the > > right size. Works fine > > with iTunes. > > Apples and oranges. MOV isn't a codec, but a container format. m4v is just > MPEG-4. You can create MPEG-4 in a MOV wrapper easily. If you want to > compare m4v to anything you've got to pick a codec, not a container format. > > - Andreas > -- > <URL:http://www.solitude.dk/> > Commentary on media, communication, culture and technology. > ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> AIDS in India: A "lurking bomb." Click and help stop AIDS now. http://us.click.yahoo.com/9QUssC/lzNLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
