[videoblogging] Re: News Video/Audio/Pics Hosting Service

2005-12-06 Thread johngaltsjournal
Which is interesting since most of the video content does not seem to be made from the uploader... But I did crack up at this music video: http://www.boltfolio.com/portfolio/video/permalink.jsp? membername=pennycontentId=2521collectionName=penny's%20video%20Stream schlomo

Re: [videoblogging] Re: News Video/Audio/Pics Hosting Service

2005-12-06 Thread robert a/k/a r
On Dec 6, 2005, at 1:38 PM, Steve Watkins wrote: I dont see whats confusing about the term 'with respect to'. OK it isnt the simplest language possible, but neither is the rest of the terms and conditions. What would probably be a good idea would be for their to also be a much sorter

Re: [videoblogging] Re: News Video/Audio/Pics Hosting Service

2005-12-06 Thread David Meade
The service apparently lets you make content public or private which seems to be the difference as to if those terms apply to video or not. Do you have to make content public to post it to your off site blog and link to it in an RSS feed? - Dave http://www.davidmeade.com

[videoblogging] Re: News Video/Audio/Pics Hosting Service

2005-12-06 Thread Steve Watkins
No, I think they only differentiate between public and private in the clause because for public stuff they need some sort of license from you to publish/distribute the work. That entire section, both the audio/pictures/video clause and the other stricter perpetual clause, only apply to public