But to get back on topic, I am still just not sure if it's the software or
the hardware that needs to be open or if it's just us as
artists...allowing our works to be a part of another work to create a
storyengine that tells a whole new story.
You are correct. Creators just need to keep
is h264 not ok as master source video codec (and final output) for both
vegas and fcp/imovie?
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 12:08 PM, Jay dedman jay.ded...@gmail.com wrote:
But to get back on topic, I am still just not sure if it's the software
or
the hardware that needs to be open or if it's
the open part of video editing tools should prob just be that of an XML
format that lays out the instructions for an edited and produced video...
with all effects, cuts, layers, paths, filenames and other metadata etc
defined.
then the software out there SHOULD be compatible as handlers and allow
is h264 not ok as master source video codec (and final output) for both
vegas and fcp/imovie?
Sure, that's doable.
But if we're really talking about collaboration, lets shoot for the
stars. We should be able to swap project files, compression settings,
fonts, make music together,
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Richard (Show) Hall rich...@... wrote:
I've been teaching this digital media class the last three semesters, and
technology is a huge barrier to creativity.
First, we only have PCs, so we can't go with FCP, so we go with Premiere
Pro, which is
- Original Message -
From: Heath
I've been teaching this digital media class the last three semesters,
and
technology is a huge barrier to creativity.
First, we only have PCs, so we can't go with FCP, so we go with Premiere
Pro, which is functionally find, but has all sorts of
thanks Steve
very interesting
-- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Steve Watkins st...@... wrote:
It will be tough to displace h.264...
Its everywhere now, new DivX for Windows is h.264 based (though uses
.mkv file wrapper format). And from what I can tell both Windows 7 and
Silverlight 3
i try to look at how things might be in 5 years if x happens or y doesnt
happen etc.
i wouldnt discourage any efforts to make a premium open standard especially
if a widely popular web browser will give you native support of that
format.
look back, and what did we have for video on the web?
This is a great initiative. Will this help me play my old BetaMaxes.
I'd like to see this get some momentum, and it is a battlefield out
there. Or it could be one more codec to have to transcode and render
in %*%%*%*%Final Cut.
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Jay dedman jay.ded...@...
My only concern is that we don't have ANY high quality web video codecs yet,
and I fear the results of settling for mediocrity as a standard prematurely.
I mean h.264-level quality in an open video format would be great for now,
but even h.264 has to be carefully encoded to get acceptably mediocre
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 2:30 PM, Brook Hinton bhin...@gmail.com wrote:
My only concern is that we don't have ANY high quality web video codecs yet,
and I fear the results of settling for mediocrity as a standard prematurely.
I mean h.264-level quality in an open video format would be great for
It will be tough to displace h.264...
Its everywhere now, new DivX for Windows is h.264 based (though uses
.mkv file wrapper format). And from what I can tell both Windows 7 and
Silverlight 3 will support h.264. Increasingly, hardware that we
record and watch video on supports h.264.
And as you
Hi Lynn
perhaps you would like to send your works to or participate in VernissageTV.
It's an open
nonprofit network that takes a look at the social side of the world of art,
design and
architecture, covering opening receptions and talking to the protagonists of
the art world.
We are looking
13 matches
Mail list logo
