No worries. I've been dealing with political posts and I'm a little
touchy. I do understand about bureaucratic stupidity. I can't tell you
the number of web sites I visit to investigate or write about them
that are inaccessible, even with DSL. 

There is a spectrum of users here. From tore down broke who do vlog on
56k to those that have new shiny toys. We got MoonBats and WingNuts
and there are a few I'm not sure take corporeal form. 

I will say the the lemming come lately television networks and
advertisers have currently co-opted the term web video. Part of what
we started to do years ago was to educate folks on what was possible.
That education is continuing in different forms but it is continuing.

It will take the lemmings more time to understand the nature of this
new medium. They still think all they have to do it stick up a tv show
and you are good to go. Same with the advertisers.

The evolution will be streamed. Case in point, November 4th when there
will be more user created content than has ever been created in one
day. It already has change by the people and for the people. 

We just got to build more infrastructure to handle the crowd.

Peace and no hard feelings,

Gena
http://outonthestoop.blogspot.com


--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "liza jean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> oops - i used a loaded word.  Gena, no offense intended.  please 
> consider forgiving me.  my post was my response to what struck me as 
> bewilderment by some posters in the "Rev3" string that a webcast tv 
> show dependent on advertising dollars would fail to turn a profit for 
> its investors who hope for broadcast tv style bang for their buck.
> 
> i had the same misunderstanding with my local library which insisted 
> on designing moving graphics into their new website which prevents my 
> good friends next door with a dial up connection from accessing the 
> site.  works fine here at the library they said.  who cares if you 
> can't get it out in the country, even if half our tax paying 
> supporters live there . . .
> 
> 
> --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Gena" <compumavengal@> 
> wrote:
> >
> > Ouch, I'm getting whacked in the head because I have leftist 
> leanings.
> > Bam, I'm getting whacked again because I work for a living and have
> > DSL. Oy, I believe there is room in the spectrum for the profane and
> > the profound. Gadzooks, I'm African-American which invalidates
> > everything else and what am I doing on a computer anyway?
> > 
> > Grrrr.....
> > 
> > Gena
> > --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "liza jean" <daredoll@> wrote:
> > >
> > > ever consider how elite this group is?  given the chosen growth 
> pattern 
> > > of broadband suppliers to feed only the rich neighborhoods 
> > > and 'redline' the rest, and the tiny percentage of the world's 
> > > population with access to high speed video on the net, i am not 
> at all 
> > > suprpised to learn early web based old school 'tv shows' are not 
> > > pulling in the results required to support them.
> > > 
> > > sent to you from my 150 year old farmhouse courtesy of my sprint 
> > > aircard.  but i have to go into town and steal wi-fi to view 
> online 
> > > videos.
> > >
> >
>


Reply via email to