Re: [videoblogging] The Streamy Awards - The Hollywood Monster?

2009-04-08 Thread Irina
a very smart man said to me after the streamys -- you never know what you're gonna get on the internet so of course hollywood award nights are always gonna be glam, fun, exclusive and expensive but who KNOWS what will actually happen with online video no matter how much money is thrown at it

Re: [videoblogging] The Streamy Awards - The Hollywood Monster?

2009-04-02 Thread Jan McLaughlin
Point, Rupert. Point. [Wild giggles] Jan Jan McLaughlin Production Sound Mixer air = 862-571-5334 aim = janofsound skype = janmclaughlin On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 11:41 AM, Rupert rup...@fatgirlinohio.org wrote: Yeah, but the first version was funnier. On 1-Apr-09, at 8:18 AM, Jeffrey Taylor

[videoblogging] The Streamy Awards - The Hollywood Monster?

2009-04-01 Thread Michael Sullivan
Are we recreating the Hollywood monster? Well, if the monster is a monster who needs recognition and validation for the work it has labored over, if it is the monster of ideas and creation, then yes. But as long as the internet is free, so is the monster. Our monster is not behind a walled garden,

Re: [videoblogging] The Streamy Awards - The Hollywood Monster?

2009-04-01 Thread Jeffrey Taylor
Oops. last sentence should read: If we want more independents like Zadi and Steve to be recognized for their exemplary work, I think we're going to have to concentrate more on where we agree than on partisan rancor. 2009/4/1 Jeffrey Taylor thejeffreytay...@gmail.com The Streamys were far from

Re: [videoblogging] The Streamy Awards - The Hollywood Monster?

2009-04-01 Thread Jeffrey Taylor
The Streamys were far from perfect, but there were as many steps in the right direction as there were in the same or wrong direction. If we want more independents like Zadi and Steve to be recognized for their exemplary work, I think we're going to have to concentrate more on where we create

Re: [videoblogging] The Streamy Awards - The Hollywood Monster?

2009-04-01 Thread Rupert
Yeah, but the first version was funnier. On 1-Apr-09, at 8:18 AM, Jeffrey Taylor wrote: Oops. last sentence should read: If we want more independents like Zadi and Steve to be recognized for their exemplary work, I think we're going to have to concentrate more on where we agree than