Re: [videoblogging] silly iPod question

2006-05-19 Thread David Meade
On 5/18/06, Paul Knight [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Good question, are there any vlogging twins?Paul Me and my brother! (DavidMeade.com and DougMeade.com) ... although doug never posts here, so I have to post twice as much to make up for him.--

Re: [videoblogging] silly iPod question

2006-05-19 Thread Richard (Show) Hall
Outside the scope? Are you kidding, what could be more relevant that the top 20 poster list?!?... Further, I would argue that we can certainly post as a Richard group, so long as I get to be the first Richard (of course, I know you were on the list first, but I'm pretty sure I'm older, and I

Re: [videoblogging] silly iPod question

2006-05-19 Thread Richard (Show) Hall
On 5/18/06, Devlon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 5/18/06, Richard BF [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At 16:09 -0700 18/5/06, Markus Sandy wrote: 1) hmmm, i better respond to each of your emails if I want to stay near the top. i recommend all other members of the top 20 poster clique do that

[videoblogging] silly iPod question

2006-05-18 Thread Richard (Show) Hall
Today is the day where:1) I make my move, to move up on the top 20 poster list2) I try and set the record for most goofy and simple questions... I have videos on my iPod... How do I get the video off of the iPod and on to my computer? (I would have thought selecting video and dragging to desk

Re: [videoblogging] silly iPod question

2006-05-18 Thread Markus Sandy
1) hmmm, i better respond to each of your emails if I want to stay near the top. i recommend all other members of the top 20 poster clique do that same to keep Richard out. sorry Richard, nothing personal, trust me. ;) 2) I'll try to keep up with silly answers. here's one: the guy at the

Re: [videoblogging] silly iPod question

2006-05-18 Thread Richard BF
At 16:09 -0700 18/5/06, Markus Sandy wrote: 1) hmmm, i better respond to each of your emails if I want to stay near the top. i recommend all other members of the top 20 poster clique do that same to keep Richard out. Just a point of order, are the Richards allow to post as a block, so our

Re: [videoblogging] silly iPod question

2006-05-18 Thread Richard BF
At 9:24 +1000 19/5/06, Richard BF wrote: Just a point of order, are the Richards allow to post as a block, so our combined posts are calculated as part of the top 20? Or is that question outside the scope of this discussing group? SPONSORED LINKS

Re: [videoblogging] silly iPod question

2006-05-18 Thread Devlon
On 5/18/06, Richard BF [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At 16:09 -0700 18/5/06, Markus Sandy wrote: 1) hmmm, i better respond to each of your emails if I want to stay near the top. i recommend all other members of the top 20 poster clique do that same to keep Richard out. Just a point of order,

Re: [videoblogging] silly iPod question

2006-05-18 Thread Paul Knight
Good question, are there any vlogging twins?PaulOn 19 May 2006, at 00:46, Devlon wrote: On 5/18/06, Richard BF [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At 16:09 -0700 18/5/06, Markus Sandy wrote: 1) hmmm, i better respond to each of your emails if I want to stay near the top.  i recommend all other members of

Re: [videoblogging] silly iPod question

2006-05-18 Thread Jen Simmons
I don't think it's a straight count. I think it's a count of emails divided by the importance of the thing you are supposed to be doing, but are avoiding by responding to vlogger email. So the bigger the procrastination, the lower the count... or is it the higher the count? j jenSimmons

Re: [videoblogging] silly iPod question

2006-05-18 Thread Adam Quirk
I'm pretty sure this will let you do that:http://www.rockbox.org/On 5/18/06, Richard (Show) Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Today is the day where:1) I make my move, to move up on the top 20 poster list2) I try and set the record for most goofy and simple questions... I have videos on my