* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/-- Anne Walk
http://loadedpun.com
SPONSORED LINKS
that's what i like about this project! a minute on camera is a lot longer than a minute in real time. watching the changes from posed to unsure to impatient. very interesting.-Anne
On 3/9/06, Melanie Morgan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is cool, but why a minute? You can see the people's
part of my personal mission is to smash this notion that making videois difficult.its easy.the other mission is to make sure people understand that their voiceis important.I dont need an audience of 1-million to show how i feel about the world.
nice answer, jay!i agree that getting involved in
hi michael,i always appreciate your input into conversations.i don't, personally have a length requirement on what i consider good. actually, i think it's sad that attention spans have reached the size of commercial spots. there is something to be said for being taken on a visual and auditory
-legs-are-too-short/ URL:
http://blogumentary.typepad.com/vlog/2005/04/bathroom_honest.html
URL: http://ryanedit.blogspot.com/2005/03/every-28-days-for-40-years_04070790966059.html
On 3/16/06, Anne Walk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
passion yes...but, just making a video makes it mediated. even
hi josh,would we have to prepay for the rooms if we confirmed now?anneOn 3/16/06, Josh Wolf
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:We're not quite there yet -- I need at least 5 individual
confirmations that they want to book the a hotel room before I'mgoing to go back to talk to them. Once I know for sure
I know that, in the art world, artists are allowed to use copyrighted materials in their work - at least, they have since I last did. In Canada, the right of the artist to use pop culture iconography as critique has held. Could be changing soon though, the way things are going.
I find it
i agree, Michael and Devlon, there needs to be a better way to search video. did you see that podzinger is searching video now? they're making an api too but i don't know when it will be out. mefeedia and others should get a hold of it when it comes out and make the videos searchable without
great! now i have that song stuck in my head!!On 3/27/06, Devlon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Damn, I wished I could even say that I had to cancel a trip to Istanbul ;)On 3/27/06, Andy Carvin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Devlon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hey bre,try this for tips on interviewshttp://www.mediacollege.com/video/interviews/tips.htmland this on basic three point lighting (the best for faces)
http://www.planetoftunes.com/dv/lighting.htmlif you're going to be shooting someone doing some sort of activity, this one is good too
hi Andrew,i think you should talk about issues that are important to you and to rocketboom. while many who post here regularly might not be interested in those topics, we do have a huge list of members and i'm sure many of them would be interested. also, there will be many at vloggercon who are
Hi all!Since there seems to be some trouble with folks knowing where to tag in order to get a list of all participants, I made up a feed using FeedBlendr of everything tagged for the week's festivities in ourmedia, delicious,technorati, and blip. I can't seem to add mefeedia as there is nothing
hi folks,I did a little writeup about a video from SightSpeed and received a special offer and I am passing it along to anyone who cares to partake.Just go to loadedpun and read
this post, including the comments and you will know what to do...:)-anne-- Anne Walk
http://loadedpun.com
hi Stephanie,can you add me too please at:http://nopractice.blogspot.com ?Thanks! good job too, btw!anneOn 4/3/06,
usadutch2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you still maintain the list please add;Blipshttp://vlogmatic.comthanks--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
, Stephanie Bryant[EMAIL
thanks, Stephanie!-anneOn 4/3/06, Charles Hope [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Stephanie Bryant[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: OK, I'm going to say mea culpa. We have many volunteers offering to
help put together the RSS feed, and I just have to pull the feeds together.
Chuck! you dirty bastard!On 4/4/06, Chuck Olsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I must take this opportunity to showcase my finest hour in therealm of vlogging. It is for the adults in the audience. I think.It's called, Bathroom Honesty.
sorry, Stephanie. here's my feedhttp://nopractice.blogspot.com/atom.xmlit's not really a blog so I dont' really think about feeds on there.
On 4/4/06, Stephanie Bryant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We're working on the RSS/web page URL and should have something by theend of the day.I have a
-generated OPML file of all the valid feeds at
http://www.mortaine.com//Video/VlogWeek.opml, so you can import them quickly (I hope) to your vlog viewing program of choice. These are the videoblogs for which I couldn't find valid feeds or any
feed or they weren't responding: Anne Walk http
geez, casey! he's been posted those online again i told him it was bad for our image!On 4/5/06, Casey McKinnon
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Devlon-What I said was Adam Curry clears up concerns that under the Podshow
contract he owns all Podshow producers' content.What he said in theinterview
from the reading on keith and the girl, however, a bigger and better opportunity would be difficult as, after the end of your contract with podshow, they retain rights to your brand in perpetuity - your name, your logo, your content during your contract and the content that you made coming into
i love the PAN. great concept with a great execution.On 4/6/06, Nathan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The PAN rocks!nathan millerwww.bicycle-sidewalk.com
--- contactmica [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello - I noticed the thread on favorite vlogs going on and I wanted to take a minute to explain a
hi mandi,depends on the type of animation. some use flash or director to animate. flash is a lot easier than director, in my opinion. stop animation is done using stills. you can do animation using a scanner (some of those can be pretty cool, i think! love low tech solutions). really, anything
I tried this freeware option and it works like a charmMPEG StreamclipYou
can use
MPEG
Streamclip to: open and play most movie formats including MPEG files or
transport streams;edit them with
Cut, Copy, Paste, and Trim; set In/Out points and convert them into
muxed or demuxed files, or export
Hi Josh.While searching for sites for testinggrounds.loadedpun.com, I've found tons of vlogs listed in a great number of sites. They do, indeed, pick up media feeds and list them. Check out Blinkx, for example. I bet you're in there.
It's a very strange feeling to go to a community site and
on converting MPEG-2 to iPod (oreven just a format iTunes will recognize properly).This is on a PC (free or cheap solutions preferred).Cheers,Rob--- In
videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Anne Walk[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I tried this freeware option and it works like a charm MPEG Streamclip
http
well, i just did a writeup of the whole thing on loadedpun and sent it off to boingboing as well. hopefully, we'll see some action soon.anneOn 4/7/06,
Devlon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:You can add your licensing info to your feed.
RSS handles this, it's Veoh that isn't playing by the rules.On
i just received a comment for someone at the company on loadedpun and responded.I'm Canadian too, Brad!On 4/7/06, Halcyon Lujah
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Well, part of this situation is due to the organic nature of the
technology growing (and not any evil plan).i.e. Veoh originally did not have
and what are we to make of the terms of service? does it include unclaimed feeds that are now a part of the Veoh system?http://veoh.com/corporate/termsOfUse.html
this is a huge can of worms that Veoh didn't need to open. there is no reason for a community site to spider other sites for feeds.
Hi Dmitry,Thankyou for responding to the group.I have a few questions and comments about this whole situation.I simply cannot see how taking video without the maker's knowledge or consent, creating a series with it, linking back to your own site, using no attribution whatsoever and implicating
to do whatever it takes to make things
right.I hope that you take me up on that offer.What can I do to makethings right?Dmitry--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Anne Walk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Dmitry, Thankyou for responding to the group. I have a few questions and comments about this whole
Devlon uses a tv tuner card in his computer (less than $100) to digitize the content. You need an RCA cord to plug into the cam and computer.One thing we've had terrible trouble with, though, is the sound going out of sync. It seems to capture audio at a slightly different rate than video. The
I agree with removing the unclaimed feeds. Most definitely. And they should stop spidering other sites. As of this moment, the spiders are still rollling. I see that ZipZapZop has a new vid out.
On 4/8/06, Peter Van Dijck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is an acceptable response from Veoh? I'm
Ok. We have asked to have our feeds removed from Veoh. Our new video was picked up this morning.I did notice, however, that they have stopped the ourmedia and blip feeds. Smart thinking as ripping off the content of other video hosting services will lead to major lawsuits (easily winnable ones
hi Jay,I don't agree that adding obvious linkback is a solution because Veoh is a social site with memberships, ratings, profiles, friends, etc. I do not like the implication that I am a member of a community because my stuff was spidered into it. Linking back may give a means to finding my
hi joly,if you upload a feed to Veoh, it is my understanding that the feed will fall under the name of the user submitting the feed. it will be claimed by them. unclaimed feeds have gotten into the system through means of automation. that's why they are not affiliated with any Veoh user.
if someone is receiving your work in it's entirety on Veoh, why, even if you have linkbacks placed in your videos, would they go back to your site? they are enjoying your stuff just fine at Veoh.also, on our site, we occassionally show other people's videos and comment on them, link to their
to me, Veoh is different from YouTube in this way:YouTube allows users to upload video. Users upload video that may or may not conform to copyright. YouTube either chooses not to monitor for copyright infringement or cannot do so.
Veoh is the same in this regard. The difference lies in the
, Anne Walk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
to me, Veoh is different from YouTube in this way:YouTube allows users to upload video. Users upload video that may or may not conform to copyright. YouTube either chooses not to monitor for copyright infringement or cannot do so.
Veoh is the same
nice way to lighten the day, Michael! (they said vlog! they said vlog!)heeheeOn 4/9/06, Michael Verdi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey,My daughter Lauren found this in the Sunday comics today: http://images.ucomics.com/comics/prc/2006/prc060409.gif
-Verdi
-- Me: http://michaelverdi.comRD:
that sounds like a very reasoned response, Jay.i look forward to seeing how this unfolds. if Veoh holds up to their statement that they will do what it takes to make things right and we agree that the right thing to do would be to remove all videos/feeds marked as unclaimed feeds, then there is
... andthen we'll get over it... in a year or two.haha. right Michael! like how we got over it with television. thank god we've moved on from america's funniest home videos to american idol. what a relief! we've moved on from spectacle!
On 4/9/06, Michael Meiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr
hi Charles,i think we had this discussion just a short while ago and it seems to be a sensitive issue. i've been contending with it myself over at loadedpun.com. basically, i try to show the video in as unaltered a state as i can.
what i tend to do is this:if the video is creative commons
hey fellas! how about starting a new thread for this discussion on transcoding? this one is getting unwieldy!On 4/10/06, Devlon
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/10/06, Andreas Haugstrup [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 10 Apr 2006 21:53:05 +0200, Michael Sullivan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SightSpeed enables video chatting between Mac and PC and does it very well. I just tested it out last week!AnneOn 4/16/06, David Howell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Trillian..
http://www.ceruleanstudios.com/Davidhttp://www.davidhowellstudios.com--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
, Richard [EMAIL
sweet, Michael! freevlog is the best site out there for learning how to vlog and i can't imagine how you can improve on itbut i don't doubt that you and ryanne will!On 4/17/06,
Michael Verdi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey ya'll,Now that Ryanne and I are done writing out book we're
lol. thanks a lot, Sull! I'll never get that out of my head now. never.On 4/18/06, Michael Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
press release info here:http://vblogsecrets.com/heheh.
On 4/18/06, Jan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:You guys got a press release for the release of the book? Would love to
pontificate away, Gena! it's important to have these kinds of discussions on the group, too, i think.i believe that economics has a huge role to play in who videoblogs. not just because of of the amount of money it takes to get hardware and software and a decent internet connection but, also,
http://www.siliconbeat.com/entries/2006/04/18/controversial_video_hosting_company_veoh_raises_125m.html
He said Veoh from the beginning had wanted to upload only content from
RSS feeds which users had explicitly submitted to Veoh. He said Veoh
had required publishers submitting feeds to insert
yup. it's a big deal. there is a petition going around that everyone should sign. you can find a pdf for one here:http://blogs.indiewire.com/anthony/archives/009835.html
On 4/19/06, Devlon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/19/06, Charles HOPE [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
bottomunion
congrats to everyone who made the cut!On 4/20/06, Casey McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Congrats Andrew!Or should I send my regards?Perhaps we should start a band of vloggers... hell, we could even callit Band of Vloggers!There's got to be some other vlogger/musiciansout there... I'm a rock
well, i'm decidedly low class and i'm going. don't know what kind of message that sends...heehee.i think it will be great to have many different kinds of people from many different lifestyles. i hope that people won't feel too nervous to go for fear of not fitting in. i'm nervous but i'm going
hey sull!this is the internet. the metric is the message!(joke)On 4/20/06, Michael Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
but now veoh works differently. so whatever.and... their is no law about screwing up someones server stats.whats more important, making media and distributing it or reading
! Groups is subject to:http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/-- Anne Walk
http://loadedpun.com
SPONSORED LINKS
Fireant
Individual
Use
anybody remember nathan peters' experiment last year?one of the vloggers in the group staged a vlog of his children being taken away (i'm still not even clear on what happened after that episode!) when it was discovered to be an experiment, people were understandably upset.
this time around,
thanks for the links, Adrian! very useful info for everyone.On 4/24/06, Adrian Miles [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:around the 24/4/06 andrew michael baron mentioned about Re:[videoblogging] Re: Trademark/Copyrights Question that:
Unlike the rest of the albums in the six-LP set produced around
what kind of vlogs are they looking for? vlogs by women? about women's issues? tv show types? On 4/25/06, Monique Danielle
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Show them a link to the 'google girls' webisode of
moronlife.comCheersMoniquehttp://www.vlogdiva.com - Techno-Babble Web Design
]
* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/-- Anne Walk
http://loadedpun.com
SPONSORED LINKS
Fireant
Individual
Use
hi joanna,whether or not it's selling out is an individual choice, i think.i, personally, find the revver player to be of low quality. i wrote about revver on my site,
loadedpun.com a while back because one of the vids that i saw there was cut off by the ad. turns out, however, that the person
barbie-doll features??? well. that just about does it for me! lolOn 4/26/06, WWWhatsup [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Our Amanda gets the treatment in the latest PAper mag:
yep,yepOn 4/26/06, Ted Tagami [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Digg DuggOn 4/26/06, Peter Van Dijck
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Come on people, some action, let's send a LOT of traffic to Ryanne,
Michael and the other's upcoming videoblogging book: go here and click
the digg link:
hi all. i have a page of links on loadedpun called useful things. it's a page of links to resources (tools, tutorials, hardware, software, etc) useful to vloggers and other digital video producers. i have room for about five more permanent links to videomaking resource sites so, if you have any
yeah, i wrote about that a while back on loadedpun. apparently, blinkx.tv also makes this claim.one of the important things about this development - and i hope that search engines pick up the technology - is that it will make video content searchable. people could search horses, for example,
you're right, josh.it's not like a comet hitting the earth. it's like a muzzle.citizen journalists would be silenced. no more inconvenient news would leak. musicians who are making their own music videos and record labels via the net would no longer have that option. it would be the major
a huge chuck of yahoo.
On 5/3/06, Anne Walk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
oops. i was thinking about net neutrality as well. of course, it's all one and same as far as agenda goes.
On 5/3/06, Casey McKinnon
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No Andreas, I'm afraid you and Josh Leo are confusing this with the
OTHER
oops. i was thinking about net neutrality as well. of course, it's all one and same as far as agenda goes.On 5/3/06, Casey McKinnon
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:No Andreas, I'm afraid you and Josh Leo are confusing this with the
OTHER threat going on right now.This thread is with regards to
this reminds me of a card i received once :The peasants are revolting! but you, I like.On 5/3/06, Markus Sandy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:this article has so many fun parts:* youtube user's revolt
* the french revolting over itunes* even technology to 'slime' revolting people
sure will, B! we are the media! it'll be the most covered event of all time!On 5/7/06, B Yen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Will Vloggercon be covered by any of the media?- Standard Model media: TV/PrintCNN, ABC, San Jose Mercury News- Webzines
slashdot.org, cnet.com, etc- high profile video-blogs
i read this list (and sometimes participate) because it comes to my mailbox.i have often thought that a forum would be better because things could be listed by topic and it would be more searchable for people looking for specific information. how many times have we had people come in here and
We are looking for a female because our golf audience is mostly male.of course. do you need a full body pose or will a head shot suffice?On 5/9/06,
arizpgapro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We are looking for a female because our golf audience is mostly male.We could have our opinion altered if we
Perhaps we should encourage more white males to video blog. They seem
to take to it more readily, so our evangelism will be more productive
if we focus on the demographic that will respond to outreach.oh charles. i find your comments so irritating. :Pwell, i posted about this fiasco on
loverly! f'n A!!On 5/11/06, Lisa Ours [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A entendre' how I adore it.Can't wait to meet you either darlin' sounds like we're gonna have smuch in common)From: Casey McKinnon
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Reply-To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.comTo:
a bit of trivia i found a while ago:Fuck is an acronym from the 16-17th centuries as a designation for sins:If a couple committing adultery were Found Under
Carnal Knowledge they would be penalized, with FUCK written on the
stocks above them to denote the crime. Variants of this include For
ah, charles?! why'd you gotta wreck it! i liked the idea of stocks involved! now it's all german.On 5/11/06, Charles HOPE
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.snopes.com/language/acronyms/fuck.htm
Anne Walk wrote:
a bit of trivia i found a while ago:
Fuck
is an acronym from
posted this on loadedpun but thought it would be a good idea to link to it here to as kind of a follow up to the latest heated discussion. i think this helps to clarify things.
http://tinyurl.com/ge9c7-- Anne Walkhttp://loadedpun.com
SPONSORED LINKS
that's fabulous, jonny! i was gonna do the same thing but now i'll just post a link at loadedpun.On 5/11/06, jonny goldstein
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:I put together links to all the videos relating to the brouhaha that I
could
a day or two late but here's my brouhaha related vidhttp://tinyurl.com/oy8pxOn 5/12/06, jonny goldstein
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Added
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Devlon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have one to add to the list please Jonny:
i don't watch tv at all anymore. i used to watch buffy but when it ended, i died a little inside. it was a communal activity. my daughters got me watching it and my best friend as well. he would watch at his house and every commercial, my phone would ring because he needed to discuss. it was
thanks for the chuckle Adrian. we have a show in Canada called Talking to Americans you might enjoy. all in good fun :)On 5/14/06,
Adrian Miles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi allsorry for subject, that's an Australianism. Just thought I'd add fuelto recent fire round here: our Prime Minister is
it's an interesting question. something i think about whenever i see a BP commercial for the environment. On 5/15/06, Michael Verdi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, it diminishes the redeeming qualities - it's like PSAs from Philip Morris.-VerdiOn 5/15/06, Josh Wolf
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
hi sull,as you say, no one can control the direction of content (that may change shortly and i'm curious to see how discussions will reflect that change). there is a difference in my mind between controlling the direction (impossible, currently) and critiquing it. no one that i know of is
anything i guess it depends on how you look at the chatter.
thankfully, some organized efforts have been made to try and stop the degrading of the open internet and bandwidth usage which is what the videoblogging medium is obviously very much dependent on.sull
On 5/15/06, Anne Walk
[EMAIL
by the advertiser.JoshOn May 15, 2006, at 11:30 AM, Mike Hudack wrote:I like the BP environmental commercials. What's the worst there? That they're raising people's awareness of their personal impact on
the environment? On 5/15/06, Anne Walk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: it's an interesting question. something i think
i think that would be too cool! by that i mean great.On 5/16/06, Bill Streeter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bruno this would be great I think. But you need to email SchlomoRabinowitz or Jay Dedman about this. I know that we are going to have
cameras at least recording each session (and maybe
, it'd either come from L'Oreal, or some company they hadcontracted with to write the checks.
JoshOn May 16, 2006, at 7:59 AM, Anne Walk wrote: hey jan, loreal is not compensating folks. currenttv is. to be a woman of worth, you must be a volunteer who's volunteer work helps,
primarily,U.S interests
very cool, Jay!On 5/16/06, Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just took a trip to the east coastand funny enough, a couple ofmy friends are now videblogging.Its funny because these were people who heard me ramble aboutvideoblogging for the past two years. Now they're doing it.
1.
yup. wrote about it a while backhttp://tinyurl.com/fu6snyou simply must check out the terms of service! it's hilarious and oh, so typical.
On 5/18/06, Jen Simmons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just found out about that Michelle Malkin has a vlog:http://hotair.com/This is bizarre - their format
hi monika,jan is right. just send them off a note and ask!if there is no notice on a work, it is assumed that it is under full copyright (at least, in canada that's true. not sure about the states), but some people just might not think of it or think much about copyright so you can't be sure.
i highly recommend foureyedmonsters.comthey are a couple of filmmakers that also have a videoblog. it is most excellent. they are using the web in wonderful ways to get their film shown.
On 5/20/06, brandenburg_wayne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You must know Schlomo then.He came to one of my
ya know i love itOn 5/22/06, Devlon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Great video KentOn 5/22/06, kentbye
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My wife and I put together a compilation video with our responses to
the earlier sexism thread:
Master Wayne? now i'm confused...On 5/24/06, Casey McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Casey wipes the tears from her eyes]Woah... okay, I see what you mean now.Caseyhttp://www.galacticast.com/--- In
videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Stupid me, I put the wrong post
.THAT should clear things up.Heath - Batman Geekhttp://batmangeek7.blogspot.com--- In
videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Anne Walk[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Master Wayne? now i'm confused... On 5/24/06, Casey McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Casey wipes the tears from her eyes] Woah... okay, I see
hi greg,great way to release an indie film! congrats!On 5/25/06, gmjoyce_y [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,People on this group have asked about indie filmmakers and their workfor a while now. After a lot of prepping and some generous technical
help from people in this group, I'm ready to start.I'm
argh. i'm so jealous! you must be having a blast, jan. do bad things in my name so that i can live vicariously through you. :)On 5/28/06, Jan McLaughlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Yeah, wish you were here, Tim D.
We're having a great time finding our place / way in SF.What a
i wish we could, Mike. i dont' think we're allowed to bring it over the borderare we? kinda wanted to bring some okanagan wines with us but not sure how that would fly (pun:)On 5/30/06,
Mike Moon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not going, but take some real beer with you.Mike
i think that the size of the viewership will be a big determinating factor in choosing one of these embedded player hosting sites to host video on...and i think that the size of the viewership is largely determined by the type of content permitted at the site.
i think that youtube is big
even though that is howmany of us experience it today. RSS is also used as connective tissue
behind the scenes of many current and future web services.-JoshOn 5/31/06, Anne Walk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i think that the size of the viewership will be a big determinating factor in choosing one
i actually don't mind the spam that comes in here. gives me new sites to check out. lots of times they're crappy but sometimes i find something postworthy.On 6/1/06,
Peter Van Dijck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone else feel this was spam? Or just me? We have guidelines aroundspamming with your
awesome zadi! very good production quality!On 6/2/06, Ted Tagami [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is awesome Zadi! Very well done.Infinity+1 News!! =)On 6/2/06, Zadi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey all, some of you know I've been working hard on a new videoblog
show for the past couple of
these are things i think about all of the time. thanks for sharing the thought, shannon.On 6/2/06, Shannon Noble
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
bad link. try again.something wacky occured.http://www.alternet.org/blogs/video/36871/
On 6/2/06,
Shannon Noble [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You
hey shannon,i'm a wee bit confused about your thoughts on meaning as meanings are always ascribed and never innate. there is no inherent meaning in anything. 'shallow is a judgement you are ascribing to the meaning.
it's also interesting to watch you manipulate with this thread so that you
1 - 100 of 105 matches
Mail list logo
