[videoblogging] Re: Flash Penetration (was vPIP 0.14 Released)
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Enric" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "LeanBackVids.com" > wrote: > > > > --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Stan Hirson, Sarah Jones" > > wrote: > > > Now I'm really curious... won't the Flash 8 player also handle Flash 7 > > > (MX) files? Why would one need Flash 7 at all? Granted, the adoption > > > of Flash 8 has not been going all that smoothly, and now there's a > > > Flash 9 player mentioned by Adobe as coming out soon. It's very > > > confusing for me as I am putting out Flash 8 videos on my vlogs. > > > > Yes, each version of the Flash player will playback movies that were > > exported as previous versions. Although, I'm not sure what you mean > > when asking "why would one need Flash 7 at all". > > > > It is much better to use an old version if you don't need the new > > features. For example, I export my Flash movies as version 6 since > > I'm not using the new Actionscripting or v8 video features. > > I was referring specifically to the Flash Player. If one is going to distribute a player, I would think it should be for the most current version. It is downwards compatible for the earlier versions of Flash. As for putting out videos, the image quality of the .swf file in Flash 8 is far superior to the earlier versions. For vlogging, I would think that one would want Flash 8. The only reason for not using Flash 8 would be that the general public has had a great deal of difficulty upgrading to it. > > Here is the official Macromedia Flash penetration (from Dec 2005)... > > > http://www.adobe.com/products/player_census/flashplayer/version_penetration.html > > > > Yet here is what I'm seeing from the VlogMap visitors... > > > > 82.6% = Flash 8 > > 15.8% = Flash 7 > > 01.6% = Other > > > > -Matt > > --- > > http://vlogmap.org > > http://ridertech.com > > http://leanbackvids.com > > > > > Thanks for the stastical data -- they may not be far off from the > general public usage. > > -- Enric I have painful experience that this is not the case! I think that VlogMap visitors are much more computer literate than most people. I have found a lot of reluctance by visitors to my Flash 8 vlogs to upgrade from Flash 7. For someone who has just gotten used to email and uses a browser primarily for Google, the Flash 8 upgrade process on IE is so daunting it often is just not done. I finally found a workaround for it, but it was difficult. I would put in a Flash 8 player and be done with it! Stan Hirson http://hestablog.com http://hestakaup.com SPONSORED LINKS Fireant Individual Typepad Use Explains YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[videoblogging] Re: Flash Penetration (was vPIP 0.14 Released)
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "LeanBackVids.com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Stan Hirson, Sarah Jones" > wrote: > > Now I'm really curious... won't the Flash 8 player also handle Flash 7 > > (MX) files? Why would one need Flash 7 at all? Granted, the adoption > > of Flash 8 has not been going all that smoothly, and now there's a > > Flash 9 player mentioned by Adobe as coming out soon. It's very > > confusing for me as I am putting out Flash 8 videos on my vlogs. > > Yes, each version of the Flash player will playback movies that were > exported as previous versions. Although, I'm not sure what you mean > when asking "why would one need Flash 7 at all". > > It is much better to use an old version if you don't need the new > features. For example, I export my Flash movies as version 6 since > I'm not using the new Actionscripting or v8 video features. > > Here is the official Macromedia Flash penetration (from Dec 2005)... > http://www.adobe.com/products/player_census/flashplayer/version_penetration.html > > Yet here is what I'm seeing from the VlogMap visitors... > > 82.6% = Flash 8 > 15.8% = Flash 7 > 01.6% = Other > > -Matt > --- > http://vlogmap.org > http://ridertech.com > http://leanbackvids.com > Thanks for the stastical data -- they may not be far off from the general public usage. -- Enric SPONSORED LINKS Fireant Individual Use Explains YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[videoblogging] Re: Flash Penetration (was vPIP 0.14 Released)
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Stan Hirson, Sarah Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Now I'm really curious... won't the Flash 8 player also handle Flash 7 > (MX) files? Why would one need Flash 7 at all? Granted, the adoption > of Flash 8 has not been going all that smoothly, and now there's a > Flash 9 player mentioned by Adobe as coming out soon. It's very > confusing for me as I am putting out Flash 8 videos on my vlogs. Yes, each version of the Flash player will playback movies that were exported as previous versions. Although, I'm not sure what you mean when asking "why would one need Flash 7 at all". It is much better to use an old version if you don't need the new features. For example, I export my Flash movies as version 6 since I'm not using the new Actionscripting or v8 video features. Here is the official Macromedia Flash penetration (from Dec 2005)... http://www.adobe.com/products/player_census/flashplayer/version_penetration.html Yet here is what I'm seeing from the VlogMap visitors... 82.6% = Flash 8 15.8% = Flash 7 01.6% = Other -Matt --- http://vlogmap.org http://ridertech.com http://leanbackvids.com SPONSORED LINKS Fireant Individual Use Explains YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
