David Meade wrote:
On 11/3/05, printaus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why is a feed meant to be reassembled? Its meant to be read and its
covered by copyright for a reason. Are you saying that all RSS feeds
are free of copyright and can be reused however you please?
RSS isn't a particularly
On Thu, 03 Nov 2005 13:07:04 +0100, printaus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It looks funny to me, I couldn't find a way to navigate to that page
through the site, could only find it through google. Is the
quicksilver frame part of it a mirror too?
The whole site is a section of the Quicksilver
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Michael Ridley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eh, I dunno if it's really a mirror - it looks like just a script
that will
display whatever you put in the arguments. For example
To be honest I think you are misreading the situation with that site.
The question ask is where you found that quiksilver link which showed
your blog contents? You found it by googling your name? I couldnt find
it in the search engines.
because as Andreas pointed out, dont think that site is
David Meade wrote:
I dunno I have a hard time with the You're stealing this content
argument if you are in fact providing a feed on your site. A feed is
MEANT to allow people to take and reassemble content.
I think where we hit a gray area, is in the republishing of the content.
If I publish
On 11/3/05, Pete Prodoehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Meade wrote:
I dunno I have a hard time with the You're stealing this content
argument if you are in fact providing a feed on your site. A feed is
MEANT to allow people to take and reassemble content.
I think where we hit a gray
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Steve Watkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
elbows of death? do I want to even ask? (does she snore bad?)
To be honest I think you are misreading the situation with that site.
to be honest I'm not sure what you mean? Who is misreading?
I agree that there is
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, David Meade [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I dunno I have a hard time with the You're stealing this content
argument if you are in fact providing a feed on your site. A feed is
MEANT to allow people to take and reassemble content. Some people
might plug it
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, David Meade [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/3/05, Pete Prodoehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Meade wrote:
I guess my thoughts are no harm no foul ... If you made a feed ...
it's going to feed things. So long as those things don't use it for
Hello,
Sorry to hear about your problems. Its understandable that some people
dont have the energy/mood to deal with ourmedia, and it is true that
we cant really complain too much as it is free and powered by love.
What alternative hosting site was recommended to you that contained
porn? Firstly
Here here to everything Mister Steve had to said.
With OurMedia, if you are uploading large files (I would say over
5MB), they have a little software tool you can install on your
computer to upload files with. I use it, and it's nifty.
Though I am an OurMedia advocate, I will admit I have
11 matches
Mail list logo