Re: [videoblogging] Everybody Hates Chris

2005-09-27 Thread bertrand
Hello, the URL of the video is within the source code of the html page.You can even download the 70 MB FLV file. >From a technical point of view, it's not Google Video. It looks more like a marketing campaign for the Show. Bertrand2005/9/27, robert a/k/a r [EMAIL PROTECTED]: so it

Re: [videoblogging] Everybody Hates Chris

2005-09-27 Thread John Dowdell
Joshua Kinberg wrote: This is not using Google's VLC plugin, which is still Windows only. This episode seems to use Flash Player on both Windows and Mac. I wonder if this was a request of the content owner wanting broadest penetration and recognizing limitations of Google's player, not to

Re: [videoblogging] Everybody Hates Chris

2005-09-26 Thread Steve Garfield
Out of sync here. On Sep 26, 2005, at 5:04 PM, andrew michael baron wrote: Wow, here it is really. TV on the web. This recent sitcom is avail thru Google and worked on my Safari browser with one click: http://video.google.com/chris.html --Steve -- Home Page - http://stevegarfield.com Video

Re: [videoblogging] Everybody Hates Chris

2005-09-26 Thread Kunga
Looks great thanks to that Google employee who wrote the Mac player in his spare time. This is the beginning of mainstream streaming of TV on the web. I love it. Chris Rock Rocks! OK who's next? Where's the directory of commercial TV shows coming out from Google Video? I am so excited.

Re: [videoblogging] Everybody Hates Chris

2005-09-26 Thread robert a/k/a r
so it appears google have abandoned their original video player scheme and gone with Flash. On Sep 26, 2005, at 5:04 PM, andrew michael baron wrote: Wow, here it is really. TV on the web. This recent sitcom is avail thru Google and worked on my Safari browser with one click:

Re: [videoblogging] Everybody Hates Chris

2005-09-26 Thread Joshua Kinberg
This is not using Google's VLC plugin, which is still Windows only. This episode seems to use Flash Player on both Windows and Mac. I wonder if this was a request of the content owner wanting broadest penetration and recognizing limitations of Google's player, not to mention the extra