Dear Sir,
Further to your electronic message of 11.15 inst, my remarks are as
follows:
My, what a simply spiffing idea. We must take immediate steps to rid
the vlogosphere of its all-pervading corruption and incivility. Only
this past week, I looked at an internet programme in which a
the O'Reilly draft code of conduct is based loosely on the blogher one isn't
it (he mentions this at
http://radar.oreilly.com/archives/2007/04/draft_bloggers_1.html)
http://blogher.org/community-guidelines
this is a good one We won't say anything online that we wouldn't say in
person.
I think
On 4/10/07, Kath O'Donnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the O'Reilly draft code of conduct is based loosely on the blogher one
isn't
it (he mentions this at
http://radar.oreilly.com/archives/2007/04/draft_bloggers_1.html)
http://blogher.org/community-guidelines
this is a good one We won't
ps I LOVE Mike's idea. Wish I had time to do anything with it...
--
best regards,
Deirdré Straughan
www.beginningwithi.com (personal)
www.tvblob.com (work)
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
that shit is legit.
I've already had a number of complaints filed against me and human dog.
they're threatening to remove V from my custody, and are in fact, as I type this, interviewing him about me.
chris weagel
www.human-dog.com
On Aug 8, 2005, at 7:59 PM, phamiltron wrote:
Is there
Someone please tell me its satire.
On 8/8/05, phamiltron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there really a league of decent vloggers?
Is it like some kind of vlogger police? I'm concerned about this after
watching Sir Edmund Twahtt's video on decent language.
