Nathan and myself, and our kids went to the waterpark yesterday and hung around for a bit.
Always remember, that not all of Nathan's video's are 100% the "truth". :)
Just to alleviate everyone's fears; Jay is correct. His oldest is now
with his ex-wife, but the other two are still with him and
Thank you, Jay. I think I joined after Nathan left. It's very easy to
become emotionally invested in something and have it blow up in your
face when it turns out to be untrue.
On 8/1/05, Jay dedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> the latest videos are not real.
> normally i woulnt spoil people's
> Nathan Peters is now a modern single dad without his children. His
> three adorable children are taken away by social security. I hate to
> sound stupid but: Does anyone here living in Canada or elsewhere know
> how Nathan is doing? His last post was from 28th.
>
> I really think we as a com
My take on all of this is that Nathan somehow used vlogging as a
venting channel. He played around with the medium, mixing reality and
fiction, and sometimes willfully playing around with his viewers. That
is fine.
However, the question for me arises when there are children in the
picture. Of
Michael Meiser said:
> In fact, I have the feeling
> we're pretty much seeing all nathan's skeletons, which is in many
> respects an incredible thing.
If you go to nathanpeters.com you can even see Nathan's skeletons,
um... fleshed out.
Josh
__
"We can bomb the world to pie
I've been in contact with Nathan about this latest blog post and
while I'm not going to say anything specific, we should remember that
Nathan's vlog has at times been a satirical look at the world around
him.
Josh
On Jul 31, 2005, at 11:28 AM, Michael Sullivan wrote:
> Nathan vlogs/blo
Just to be clear, I wasn't saying video blogging was to blame. I said
it was an aggravating factor. And clearly that it was so public and
accessible was an aggrevating factor. But yes, I completely agree with
you, ultimately it was Nathan's choices as you well illustrate.
I should also s
Nathan vlogs/blogs about the issue... i dont think he would mind people
discussing it and wishing him well. if we should assume not to
discuss something that he is blogging about, as contradictive as that
may be then Nathan will prob let us know.
as for the issue of consequential vlogging.
Please, vidoblogging is clearly not the culprit.
Nathan's choices are his own.
The only thing we know of this is what he has presented in his
videoblog. I certainly do not claim to have any facts on the matter
other than what I've seen in his recent video posts.
I think Nathan is a well-meani
I'm not sure this is the place or time to critique Nathan's choices or
discuss the specifics.
On some level, and I don't know what that level is, we need to respect
his right to bring these matters to the public as he sees fit and
pledge our patient support. If you feel strongly about pa
I believe its all unreal...
and he doesnt do any of that around his kids or maybe not at all.
its some sort of atrtistic statements... right?
anyways, nathan, i hope things work out ok for you... and maybe its time to reconsider your approach...
your kids should matter moreso than your art.
My goodness Nathan, lets talk about this. In this video, you are
smoking pot and admiting that you do coke around your kids.
http://www.modernsingledad.com/files/possibilitiespart1.wmv
I'm not sure that this is all a very good idea. What is your
reasoning behind this?
It sounds like it mu
12 matches
Mail list logo
