image linkhttp://missbhavens.blogspot.com/link
urlhttp://idisk.mac.com/missbhavens-Public/star.jpg/url
titleWhere's my picture?/title/imageSee the extra quote at the end? Also, your image isn't showing up when you load up your FeedBurner page at
what kinds of images? png? jpeg? gif?
missbhavens1969 wrote:
I care! I care!
And I've tried. I've added the picture into the feed. Different pictures. Different logos.
Different sizes. No go. i have absolutely no idea what I'm doing wrong. Something,
obviously...but what could it be?
If you use FeedBurner:
- Log in to your feedburner account
- Click on the feed you want to deal with
- Click the Optimize tab
- Click the Feed Image Burner link on the bottom left
- Change image source to specify custom image URL
- Enter the image URL (image should be no bigger than 144px tall or
Hello Josh
On 2/18/06, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
- Enter the image URL (image should be no bigger than 144px tall or wide)
Isn't the max size of an RSS Image 144x400 (and not 144x144 as you
suggested)? Or is there some application out there that only handle a
max of
Hello Josh,
Do you know if iTunes will use the RSS image if the itunes:image
is left out?
According to this...
http://www.reallysimplesyndication.com/2005/06/28#a682
iTunes will use things like the RSS category if you don't use
itunes:category.
(And yeah, I agree, iTunes RSS is one of the
It says if the itunes:image tag isn't present, it will use the RSS
image tag... can anyone say redundant?
-Josh
On 2/18/06, Charles Iliya Krempeaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Josh,
Do you know if iTunes will use the RSS image if the itunes:image
is left out?
According to this...
Just as a note, the FireAnt directory prefers iTunes images because of
the size limitations of standard RSS images. We need larger images, and
whether you like the iTunes spec or not, it's the only thing that
provides large images that can be scaled down instead of being scaled
up.
ClintOn
The thing is, many podcast/vidoeblog feeds rushed to adopt iTunes spec. It is more common to see itunes:image than it is to see the standard RSS image tags. So if its in the feed, we'll use it. No need for religious wars. I just find it annoying that we now have to support so many variations of
On Sat, 18 Feb 2006 22:50:52 +0100, Michael Sullivan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i dont understand about the size stuff
i've seen some huge rss channel images come through.
can you explain?
Some people don't read specs.
- Andreas
--
URL:http://www.solitude.dk/
Commentary on media,
you could include a class to detect image dimensions and if smaller than what your max pref is for FA, no scaling, else, scale down accordingly. On 2/18/06,
Clint Sharp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just as a note, the FireAnt directory prefers iTunes images because of
the size limitations of
religious war... ha.the difference is, i find it annoying AND dont feel like adapting to illogical implementations.maybe feedburner etc should just merge the two... resolve it at the source any service or app that generates RSS might as well merge any redundancies upon generating the feeds.
Changes in the FireAnt directory may not take effect immediately... it
will take effect the next time our server grabs your RSS feed, which
is roughly once an hour.
We are working on implementing a Ping mechanism so you can notify our
server when you make a change to your RSS feed.
-Josh
http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss#ltimagegtSubelementOfLtchannelgt
Maximum value for width is 144, default value is 88.
Maximum value for height is 400, default value is 31.
This means that people publishing images under the RSS maximum width is
144 pixels. This isn't nearly large
totally. crApple!thats why i stopped myself from modifying my rss parser to grab it... dont want to encourage people not to use the true RSS channel spec.sullOn 2/18/06,
Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It says if the itunes:image tag isn't present, it will use the RSSimage tag... can
14 matches
Mail list logo
