Deirdre Straughan wrote:
On 11/2/05, Pete Prodoehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please define big success as the term may have different meanings to
different people.
Used by millions of people worldwide. Whether anyone is making money off
it or not is immaterial (to me, anyway).
Ok... We
Ah, I see where the confusion comes in. I was talking about the success
of videoblogging in general as a technology/technique/medium - not
anyone's specific videoblog, let alone my own! Success for any
individual's vlog is best defined by that person, of course!-- best regards,Deirdré
On 11/1/05, Pete Prodoehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What will happen is that videoblogging will change from being a nicefriendly little community we are used to seeing here, into one wherepeople treat it like a competition for viewers, become obsessed with
stats and popularity, insult other
Deirdre Straughan wrote:
On 11/1/05, Pete Prodoehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What will happen is that videoblogging will change from being a nice
friendly little community we are used to seeing here, into one where
people treat it like a competition for viewers, become obsessed with
stats and
Jake Ludington wrote:
In the context of companies who use video blogging to further their cause
without giving anything back to the video blogging community; Microsoft
already does that with Channel 9. The upside of Channel 9 to Microsoft the
corporate entity is creating a warm fuzzy feeling
On 11/2/05, Pete Prodoehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
LOL. Seems to me it has already happened, as it was bound to. A technology can either be a big success or can be a nice little community - not both at the same time.Please define big success as the term may have different meanings to
different
Deirdre Straughan wrote:
On 11/2/05, Pete Prodoehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
LOL. Seems to me it has already happened, as it was bound to. A
technology
can either be a big success or can be a nice little community - not both
at the same time.
Please define big success as the term may have
LOL. Seems to me it has already happened, as it was bound to. A technology can
either be a big success or can be a nice little community - not both at the
same time.
Technologies dont create
communities, people do. Its up to the people in a community whether they
nurture it through
Gena wrote:
I'm not angry at the guy. But it does say a lot about how one group
will do the figuring out and others come by to adapt and appropriate.
It is capitalism 101. Not saying it is good or bad.
I can honestly say that sometimes I get really sick of always being in
the first group,
In the NerdTV
Show #6 Interview with Dave Winer, http://www.pbs.org/cringely/nerdtv/shows/ ,
Dave talks about how Netscape first took his idea of RSS and didn't compeletely
implement it and then Dave released a new, better version with his features
added to Netscapes' implementation
Jake Ludington wrote:
In the NerdTV http://www.pbs.org/cringely/nerdtv/shows/ Show #6
Interview with Dave Winer, http://www.pbs.org/cringely/nerdtv/shows/ , Dave
talks about how Netscape first took his idea of RSS and didn't compeletely
implement it and then Dave released a new, better
11 matches
Mail list logo
