Re: [videoblogging] Spirit can not be spoken for

2005-11-27 Thread Michael Sullivan
://www.randywickerreporting.blogspot.com/201-656-3280 - Original Message - From: Michael Sullivan To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, November 26, 2005 10:54 AM Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Spirit can not be spoken for actually, on vlogdir, characters and numericals show up

Re: [videoblogging] Spirit can not be spoken for

2005-11-26 Thread Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen
On Sat, 26 Nov 2005 03:03:40 +0100, Randolfe Wicker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think vlogging can be greatly impacted through directories. That is why we as a community should work to set up an open directory that will become the accepted norm. Otherwise, others will set up slanted

Re: [videoblogging] Spirit can not be spoken for

2005-11-26 Thread robert a/k/a r
Heh. If you have a name that begins with a numeric (i.e., 29 fragile days or 24x7), some of the directories don't have links. For example, mefeedia put links for A through Z but no 0-9. Go figure. Guess we'll have to wait until someone figures out we exist and creates a more accurate

Re: [videoblogging] Spirit can not be spoken for

2005-11-26 Thread Michael Sullivan
actually, on vlogdir, characters and numericals show up first when browsing the directory there is a menu item on right of main page browse directory. 24x7 is the 5th one listed =)sull On 11/26/05, robert a/k/a r [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Heh. If you have a name that begins with a numeric

Re: [videoblogging] Spirit can not be spoken for

2005-11-26 Thread Randolfe Wicker
://www.randywickerreporting.blogspot.com/201-656-3280 - Original Message - From: Brad Webb To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, November 25, 2005 9:28 PM Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Spirit can not be spoken for Nevermind the fact that this is an easy

Re: [videoblogging] Spirit can not be spoken for

2005-11-26 Thread Randolfe Wicker
://www.randywickerreporting.blogspot.com/201-656-3280 - Original Message - From: Michael Sullivan To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, November 26, 2005 10:54 AM Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Spirit can not be spoken for actually, on vlogdir, characters and numericals

Re: [videoblogging] Spirit can not be spoken for

2005-11-26 Thread Randolfe Wicker
: Deirdre Straughan To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, November 26, 2005 1:54 AM Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Spirit can not be spoken for On 11/26/05, Randolfe Wicker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm still looking for something better than

Re: [videoblogging] Spirit can not be spoken for

2005-11-26 Thread Randolfe Wicker
- Original Message - From: Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, November 26, 2005 3:15 AM Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Spirit can not be spoken for On Sat, 26 Nov 2005 03:03:40 +0100, Randolfe Wicker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think

Re: [videoblogging] Spirit can not be spoken for

2005-11-26 Thread Lucas Gonze
On 11/26/05, Randolfe Wicker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You are wrong!!! See my next post about hidden diamonds. Did you see them before?? NO!!! All my work over the past few years has been under the same assumptions as Deirdre has, and so far this has gone fine. The only problem I face is

Re: [videoblogging] Spirit can not be spoken for

2005-11-26 Thread Ted Tagami
An experimental art piece: http://tagami.com/2005/11/26/november-in-berkeley/ Please let me know what you think about it @ http://tagami.com The object is called Rotante Dal Foro Centrale. The music is from the Campaile just after 2 bells. -- Ted Tagamitagami.comU N I V E R S U S

Re: [videoblogging] Spirit can not be spoken for

2005-11-25 Thread Michael Meiser
1) I agree with Andrew that video blogging is somehow intrinsically different than audio podcasting. By it's nature it's more personal, MUCH more personal, and that's being reflected in how it's used by tighter communities. The same thing that makes video blogging more personal (the visual

Re: [videoblogging] Spirit can not be spoken for

2005-11-25 Thread Michael Sullivan
Well, that's all I've got to say about that. :)took the words right out of my mouth :) ah, that was easy.note to members of this mail list: pay attention to the words mike meiser transmits. he takes the time to intricately discuss broad perspectives of the open media culture. that, my friends,

Re: [videoblogging] Spirit can not be spoken for

2005-11-25 Thread Randolfe Wicker
andrew michael baron says: "While in truth, no one can stop anyone from the mere act of podcasting, and granted, podcasters have all kinds of motives, podcasters were not included in the new, popularized search and discovery mechanism where I believe most wanted to be; the directory is

Re: [videoblogging] Spirit can not be spoken for

2005-11-25 Thread Joshua Kinberg
Its all in the works... be patient :-) -Josh On 11/25/05, Randolfe Wicker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: andrew michael baron says: While in truth, no one can stop anyone from the mere act of podcasting, and granted, podcasters have all kinds of motives, podcasters were not included in

Re: [videoblogging] Spirit can not be spoken for

2005-11-25 Thread andrew michael baron
On Nov 25, 2005, at 9:03 PM, Randolfe Wicker wrote: That is why we as a community should work to set up an "open directory" that will become the accepted norm.  There should not be just one. In the long run there never will be. SPONSORED LINKS

Re: [videoblogging] Spirit can not be spoken for

2005-11-25 Thread Brad Webb
Nevermind the fact that this is an easy path to an exclusionary clique of accepted goodness. Plus, the secondary part of Randy's point -- that having an open, accepted directory would prevent other closed ones -- just won't happen. If anything, I think the folks working towards

Re: [videoblogging] Spirit can not be spoken for

2005-11-25 Thread Deirdre Straughan
On 11/26/05, Randolfe Wicker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm still looking for something better than random searching to find good stuff. We need a filter, reviewers, trusted guides--not judges and lawmakers. That's already happening via the search engines, as well as specialized directories.

Re: [videoblogging] Spirit can not be spoken for

2005-11-24 Thread Deirdre Straughan
On 11/25/05, andrew michael baron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: When Apple came along and did what may have seemed like the same thing for video podcasting, things were different. As I mentioned in the TUAW interview, the videoblogging community can not be co-opted. That's because it is not