if it works babe don't you stop
On 29 Sep 2005, at 04:54, Kunga wrote:
The group seems to be against the idea of using H.264 due to the
smaller installed base of QuickTime 7 seats. I am using HandBrake to
achieve less than 1 MB per minute. Please tell us what size per
minute you are
Adam Quirk wrote:
Jan mentioned something last weekend that I wouldn't have thought about:
Once a hand-held camera shot (shaky) is blown up full screen, a lot of
people are going to be puking. The shakiness is fine when it's a little
window, but when it's all you see, people are liable to
Jan mentioned something last weekend that I wouldn't have thought about:
Once a hand-held camera shot (shaky) is blown up full screen, a lot of
people are going to be puking. The shakiness is fine when it's a
little window, but when it's all you see, people are liable to get
sick. So for those
The group seems to be against the idea of using H.264 due to the
smaller installed base of QuickTime 7 seats. I am using HandBrake to
achieve less than 1 MB per minute. Please tell us what size per
minute you are shooting for.
--
Taylor Barcroft http://www.blogger.com/profile/11159903
New
I have been (shock horror) watching vlogs in itunes since 4.9.
There are a number of reasons for this mostly because its there and its
easy. One thing I did enjoy was the ease of the full screen option. 320 *240
blows up suprisingly well to full screen but for the TV playback 640*480 or
720*576
