Re: [Videolib] Nonprofit exemption

My problem with things like this and the you can stream any feature film released in theaters without permission/license claim/theory is that all these "theories" some from the same exact voices in the same echo chamber. IF institutions actually believed this was legal, then they should state so

Re: [Videolib] Nonprofit exemption

I'm agreeing with Andy and would like to point out... "performance of a nondramatic literary or musical work *otherwise* than in a transmission to the public" The use of "otherwise" makes me believe that "transmission" (usually meaning a by mechanical method -- ie. a projector or monitor) to the

Re: [Videolib] Nonprofit exemption

Hi deg and Sarah, 110(4) seems to me to refer specifically to "nondramatic *literary or musical work*[s]." The Copyright Office's glossary notes that "nondramatic literary works are intended to be

Re: [Videolib] Nonprofit exemption

It's section 110 (4). Fascinating. Sarah McCleskey Head of Access Services Hofstra University Library sarah.e.mccles...@hofstra.edu Sent from my iPhone > On Jun 7, 2016, at 11:13 AM, Deg Farrelly wrote: > > Attending the Kraemer Copyright Symposium in Colorado Springs.

[Videolib] Nonprofit exemption

Attending the Kraemer Copyright Symposium in Colorado Springs. (Kenneth Crewes and Kevin Smith making great presentations among others...) At a session yesterday, delivered by IP lawyers, the notion of the non-profit exemption for use of non-literary and music works was raised. Quite