Thanks, deg! I agree with everything there!
Ha! Surprised you all. :-)
The only points I would make:
1) The story to find Chester Novell Turner is meant to illustrate the "not
reasonable effort" to find a copyright holder. This story is not about a
librarian and really champions the efforts of
Nice….Thanks, Deg!
Rhonda
From: videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu
[mailto:videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu] On Behalf Of Deg Farrelly
Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2016 12:59 PM
To: videolib@lists.berkeley.edu
Cc: Chris Lewis; Surdi, Jane
Subject: [Videolib] Library Journal publishes article on
In the hard copy of Library Journal this week, or available online here:
http://lj.libraryjournal.com/2016/06/technology/please-rewind-preservation/#_
(Not sure if the link works for non subscribers)
Includes references to presentation Chris Lewis, Jane Hutchison Surdi, and I
will be making at
I think what faculty and librarians have trouble with is that a complete
legally purchased film can be shown in class but for the exact same class and
using the exact same film to be shown in a distance class, we have to pay
significantly more licensing/access and do not even own the film. So
All,
110(4) is a great (and under-appreciated) bit of law, but why would it apply to
audiovisual works when it doesn’t specifically mention them? Are documentary
films really both literary and audiovisual works?
Eric Harbeson
From: videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu
