Re: [Videolib] ACRL Best Practices

2012-01-30 Thread Patricia Aufderheide
Thank you for reading these! 1) In terms of e-reserves (section 1), it's really important to read both the limitations and the enhancements. They qualify that general assertion, and make clear that you need a transformative purpose, which in the case of e-reserves would be appropriate to the

Re: [Videolib] ACRL Best Practices

2012-01-30 Thread ghandman
Thanks, Pat (and thanks again for spearheading the development of these guidelines) I am a still a bit concerned about the e-reserves section--the limitations and enhancements not withstanding. If I am reading this section correctly, almost any full-length copyrighted video work that is central

Re: [Videolib] ACRL Best Practices

2012-01-30 Thread ghandman
I dunno about that, Bob...I'm just trying to get some clarity in these concepts and guidelines. gary Three cheers to Gary for sticking up for the content owners. Bob Film Ideas, Inc. On Jan 30, 2012, at 2:55 PM, videolib-requ...@lists.berkeley.edu wrote: When replying, please edit your

Re: [Videolib] ACRL Best Practices

2012-01-30 Thread Jessica Rosner
Thanks Gary but I think it is more than that. Face to Face really can not be used at all as it is VERY specific that this applies ONLY to films shown in physical location with an instructor present. Luckily it is one of the few copyright exemptions that is very very clear. It strikes me that