Follow-up: I talked with the filmmaker and clarified their intentions. All is
good now. As I suspected, they just really haven't done DVD sales to libraries
before.
~Barb
VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of issues
relating to the selection, evaluation,
I kind of suspected that too. The language was kind of like a mixed up cut
and paste. Glad it worked out.
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 5:29 PM, Bergman, Barbara J
barbara.berg...@mnsu.edu wrote:
Follow-up: I talked with the filmmaker and clarified their intentions.
All is good now. As I
Barb, were they willing to alter the license terms?
Sent from my iPad
On Dec 17, 2012, at 5:38 PM, Bergman, Barbara J
barbara.berg...@mnsu.edumailto:barbara.berg...@mnsu.edu wrote:
Follow-up: I talked with the filmmaker and clarified their intentions. All is
good now. As I suspected, they
Aaaand I think we're all about to get more requests for this title --
looks like they have a good publicity push behind the film:
http://www.slate.com/blogs/xx_factor/2012/12/14/sexy_baby_a_new_documentary_explores_sex_and_the_internet.html
I've found that one of the more challenging parts of
Yes, these are the exact words found on the website for a newly released DVD.
After generously (sarcasm font) granting me classroom screening rights, they
un-grant PPR in bullet 3, and forbid library lending in bullet 4. This is me
beating head on desk before contacting them to talk about
Not a lot of sales with those restrictions.
#2 and 3 are bizarre mishmosh of various uses.
Also are they selling this title retail or through third party vendors to
individuals? As I posted many times they can restrict a sale by contract
but they can't do it after the fact or reduce rights
Barb I'm so glad you posted this. Last week I returned a DVD for a refund after
seeing the licensing terms. The vendor was really unhappy and didn't want to
give me a refund but thank goodness it worked out. Are people just randomly
making up their terms??? I think yes.
Sarah
Sent from my
Slightly OT Sarah but years ago I produced a DVD series of silent films by
women directors (I hope you all have a copy) and it was about the only Kino
title that you could NOT buy retail or through a third party ( an
experiment of sorts) Anyway I sold a copy to a state school in CA and they
Though Barbara doesn't mention the title of the video, pasting the license
terms into Google quickly returned the link to the vendor.
My immediate reactionŠ. What is there in this film that is not already
covered in a number of other videos, particularly the Media Education
Foundation titles Sext
Title and its content wasn't my point. The film was requested by the Women's
Center because they'll like to do a campus screening. I've warned her that they
may need to pick something else.
I'm guessing filmmaker is trying to do everything independently instead of
going through one of our
Now I am a bit more confused. The director was not willing to sell you a
copy with REAL PPR rights for a reasonable fee? What fee did they want
for purchase with rights to show on campus or did they have one?
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 6:25 PM, Bergman, Barbara J
barbara.berg...@mnsu.edu wrote:
11 matches
Mail list logo
