Re: [Videolib] Nonprofit exemption

2016-06-10 Thread Jessica Rosner
Sarah I believe most librarians are good guys but I think they are under a lot of pressure from instructurs to get any material they need in whatever format they ask and from admiinstration to cut costs. I don't have the budge to go to conferences especially in Colorado but I there it is clear

Re: [Videolib] Nonprofit exemption

2016-06-10 Thread Sarah E. McCleskey
I believe the schedule and presentation slides are online. Most librarians are trying to be the good guy and not rip other people off. I suggest you start actually attending these conferences before issuing uninformed blanket judgments from anonymous IP attorneys who weren't even there.

Re: [Videolib] Nonprofit exemption

2016-06-10 Thread Jessica Rosner
Sarah Out of curiosity I checked with two copyright lawyers I know. Neither actually knew of the Kraemer seminars and neither had heard the one law film that was a sponsor ( along with many academic groups) but said that person listed as their IP leader was a trademark lawyer who was not involved

Re: [Videolib] Nonprofit exemption

2016-06-10 Thread Jessica Rosner
is and has always been in Colorado Springs. That's the one > that folks are talking about now. :) > > Eric > > Get Outlook for iOS <https://aka.ms/o0ukef> > > _ > From: Jessica Rosner <maddux2...@gmail.com> > Sent: Friday,

Re: [Videolib] Nonprofit exemption

2016-06-10 Thread Eric J Harbeson
essica Rosner <maddux2...@gmail.com<mailto:maddux2...@gmail.com>> Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 7:54 AM Subject: Re: [Videolib] Nonprofit exemption To: <videolib@lists.berkeley.edu<mailto:videolib@lists.berkeley.edu>> Yes I know this happens at Kraemer which I went to

Re: [Videolib] Nonprofit exemption

2016-06-10 Thread Jessica Rosner
Yes I know this happens at Kraemer which I went to once in NYC BUT in the dozens of other webninars and seminars mentioned here I never see any representation from from rights holders. I am curious if in the specific discussion on the "non profit" exemption was there any participation by right

Re: [Videolib] Nonprofit exemption

2016-06-10 Thread Sarah E. McCleskey
Hi Jessica, You might be surprised to know that the UCCS Copyright conference was sponsored by (among others) a law firm specializing in intellectual property. Several IP attorneys gave a number of very useful presentations and engaged with attendees informally in discussions. Their presence

Re: [Videolib] Nonprofit exemption

2016-06-09 Thread Bogage, Alan
: videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu [mailto:videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu] On Behalf Of Eric J Harbeson Sent: Thursday, June 9, 2016 1:00 PM To: videolib@lists.berkeley.edu Subject: Re: [Videolib] Nonprofit exemption All, 110(4) is a great (and under-appreciated) bit of law, but why would

Re: [Videolib] Nonprofit exemption

2016-06-09 Thread Eric J Harbeson
...@lists.berkeley.edu] On Behalf Of Jessica Rosner Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2016 7:25 PM To: videolib@lists.berkeley.edu Subject: Re: [Videolib] Nonprofit exemption My problem with things like this and the you can stream any feature film released in theaters without permission/license claim/theory

Re: [Videolib] Nonprofit exemption

2016-06-07 Thread Jessica Rosner
My problem with things like this and the you can stream any feature film released in theaters without permission/license claim/theory is that all these "theories" some from the same exact voices in the same echo chamber. IF institutions actually believed this was legal, then they should state so

Re: [Videolib] Nonprofit exemption

2016-06-07 Thread Dennis Doros
I'm agreeing with Andy and would like to point out... "performance of a nondramatic literary or musical work *otherwise* than in a transmission to the public" The use of "otherwise" makes me believe that "transmission" (usually meaning a by mechanical method -- ie. a projector or monitor) to the

Re: [Videolib] Nonprofit exemption

2016-06-07 Thread Andrew Horbal
Hi deg and Sarah, 110(4) seems to me to refer specifically to "nondramatic *literary or musical work*[s]." The Copyright Office's glossary notes that "nondramatic literary works are intended to be

Re: [Videolib] Nonprofit exemption

2016-06-07 Thread Sarah E. McCleskey
It's section 110 (4). Fascinating. Sarah McCleskey Head of Access Services Hofstra University Library sarah.e.mccles...@hofstra.edu Sent from my iPhone > On Jun 7, 2016, at 11:13 AM, Deg Farrelly wrote: > > Attending the Kraemer Copyright Symposium in Colorado Springs.

[Videolib] Nonprofit exemption

2016-06-07 Thread Deg Farrelly
Attending the Kraemer Copyright Symposium in Colorado Springs. (Kenneth Crewes and Kevin Smith making great presentations among others...) At a session yesterday, delivered by IP lawyers, the notion of the non-profit exemption for use of non-literary and music works was raised. Quite