Sir/Madam,
Please, let us suggest you to contact us at our e-mail address:
i...@algaeditores.com , where we will send information about of more that
160 DVD on Spanish Literature,Theatre,Cinema, Folklore (Flamenco) etc.
All our production are available in Zone 0 , PAL or NTSC systems.
In
Dear Natalia,
SubCine is, as far as I know, the only distributor in the U.S. focusing
exclusively on U.S. Latino and Latin American film for the eductional
market.
All of our films come with PPRs, and can be found here: http://subcine.com
Great luck with your search, and please let us know if
I exceeded my PayPal spending limit a year or so ago. I contacted
our Office of Institutional Purchasing folks to see if they had any
ideas around this problem. They did not. Foolishly, I asked if I
could pay directly from a university bank acct. (the way I set up
the
Helen,
I don't know which places this works, but one place it rarely works is eBay.
Most regular places do in fact take a regular CC
but not all. I work on two films where Paypal is the only credit card option
( both do accept checks and even purchase order numbers).
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 9:17
It would be very unlikely the on line free DVD included PPR rights
especially if it is sold separately with them. In general unless something
says PPR, it probably does not have it, including online items at least
those under copyright. There are now a number of titles on line for free
through
Two articles of interest this morning:
http://blogs.library.duke.edu/scholcomm/2011/10/04/streaming-video-case-dismissed/
http://www.aime.org/news.php?download=nG0kWaN9ozI3plMlCGRmu=11100412
Philip Hallman
Film Studies Librarian
Donald Hall Collection
Dept of Screen Arts Cultures /
I found this a particularly interesting summation (from the Duke blogger):
What solace the higher education market can take from this case is in a few
lines in which the judge seems to accept without discussion two assertions -
that streaming is not a distribution such as to infringe the
I think you need to keep in mind that that section applied only to films
sold with PPR and UCLA was streaming thousands of standard films. The
problem is none of those rights holders got involved. Also I suspect that
from now on any company selling films with PPR will add to their contract
that no
Surely Universal Studios has more powerful lawyers than UCLA, I wonder why
they, or other major studios, were not a party to the suit. Should we infer
anything from their silence?
Matt
__
Matt Ball
Media Services Librarian
University of Virginia
Trust me you can infer that they are idiots. These are the same people (
Through the MPAA) who testified before Congress and spent resources to stop
schools from breaking encryption to use CLIPS. I would definitely NOT infer
they are not going to protect their rights. Remember that the discovery
Dear Alex,
Thanks very much! I wasn't aware of Subcine and we will definitely explore the
catalog.
Thanks again,
Natalia
Natalia Taylor Bowdoin, M.L.S., M.A.
Library Collections Coordinator
Gregg-Graniteville Library
University of South Carolina Aiken
471 University Parkway
Aiken, S.C. 29801
it is a very common confusion but the fact that an item is available on line
without charge and that you show it without charge actually makes no
difference in terms of copyright law. Any public performance requires
permission of a rights holder. There was a time when
there was in fact a crackdown
Honestly that makes no sense to me anyway. You don't need PPR for any film
being PHYSICALLY shown or used in library or class. It is almost always
meant for the ability to show it OUTSIDE of a class. In this case I think
the PPR is a red herring here. It makes the c this case and the judgement
Jessica,
From the Ambrose website:
The Content is licensed solely for classroom teaching, research, educational
non-commercial multimedia projects, classroom presentations, and individual
presentations for use in educational institutions or public libraries. PUBLIC
PERFORMANCE RIGHTS A
OK I am totally confused. Are they adding or limiting rights? I work mainly
with filmmakers directly for very small distributors who basically can not
afford (at least now) and delivery system of their own, but since they own
the film they can pretty much sell any rights they want forever and for
Weird language.
The other part though is not true. Virtually all of the studio titles
streamed by UCLA could have been licensed through Swank and many of the
others could have been gotten as well. However this would be another red
herring as I don't think the but it is not available for streaming
One more thing. While the list did not include films made exclusively for
educational instruction, they did include indeed many, many titles sold only
for the educational market. Titles released by places like Bullfrog, Women
Make Movies, California Newsreel ( and don't kill me guys) really do not
Hi Natalia,
I just checked our web site www.filmakers.com and under the subject
heading of Latin America we have 101 documentaries. They are both
from and about--many are award winners. Of course, we would be happy
to help you if you have questions. And above all, welcome to the
I'm finding that the process of acquiring streamed media is moving things more
to Tech Services - Acquisitions (license review and purchasing), Systems. And
my favorite: the serials committee, because licensed material is not a one-time
purchase.
I make the we should buy this presentation and
The Duke Library blog may well be worth reading.
Brigid Duffy
Academic Technology
San Francisco State University
San Francisco, CA 94132-4200
E-mail: bdu...@sfsu.edu
From: Media in Education [medi...@listserv.binghamton.edu] on behalf
of Ted Langdell [t...@tedlangdell.com]
Sent: Tuesday,
20 matches
Mail list logo
