I wholeheartedly disagree.
There are 2 issues here: obtaining a video to meet a faculty member's need and
applying section 108 to make a copy of that video.
After diligently looking, it's been determined that the only sources for this
video are used VHS.
If the library purchases a video for i
Greetings, everyone
I second this interpretation by Deg. There is nothing in 108 that specifies a
film must "already be in the collection" (if that were the case, then already
in the collection since... when?). There is so much misinformation about this
stuff, especially, at times, from certai
Apologies to all who have been trying to get in touch with us. We had a very
bad leak in our ceiling over the weekend and as a result our server, internet
and telephones have been down.We now have internet access and can access
our email but our telephones are still down. If you have an
I third this interpretation by Deg and Terry.
It is important to read the law for yourself because sometimes there is
misinformation on this list and with content providers.
Jo Ann
Jo Ann Reynolds
Reserve Services Coordinator
Homer Babbidge Library
University of Connecticut
369 Fairfield Road,
I happen to agree with Terry and deg except for this:
"Copyright law has shifted far far to the side of protections for content
creators."
That's just not true and Jo Ann, this would also be an example of
misinformation. Access has never been cheaper (anyone remember $2000 for a
16mm *lease*?) be
Me Too!
Michael Brewer | Librarian | Head, Research & Learning |
brew...@email.arizona.edu
-Original Message-
From: videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu
[mailto:videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu] On Behalf Of Reynolds, Jo Ann
Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2016 8:07 AM
To: videolib@lis
Points well taken, Dennis.
It is true that copyright law is becoming more, not sure what the correct
description would be, contentious?, visible?, but as ill understood as ever.
My agreement was with the Section 108 issues and the misinformation that swirls
around Section 108 (but also extends
Dennis,
Just because “people” are breaking laws doesn’t mean the laws don’t exist and
are not heavily weighted for content creators. Your “test” is disingenuous,
and no test at all. Watching a video, even one put up illegally, is not,
AFAIK, a crime. Rephrase your question: how many of us in
I think this is true for the massive pirating culture but I think the
situation for libraries is about to change radically which despite
everything I think is very scary. As both institutions and distributor
shift to digital access most of these discussions will if you will excuse
the phrase become
Terry,
First, I really don't holler. It's not my style.
I'm not pointing out that you are breaking the law by watching a Bowie
video. Just the fact that there's a *vast* amount of illegal videos out
there and they have become a fact of life. When we want to watch a scene
from a movie, we don't go
You were missed
Jessica
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 9:37 AM, Debra Zimmerman wrote:
> Apologies to all who have been trying to get in touch with us. We had a
> very bad leak in our ceiling over the weekend and as a result our server,
> internet and telephones have been down.We now have intern
Due to popular request the submission deadline for break-out sessions and
poster proposals for the 2016 Kraemer Copyright Conference at UCCS has been
extended through 5pm (Mountain Standard Time) on January 18, 2016. Visit this
webpage to learn more about the proposal submission process:
http:/
12 matches
Mail list logo
