Re: [VM] Any interest in trying to make local vs. IMAP folder treatment more seamless

2012-06-13 Thread Uday Reddy
blueman writes: Unfortunately, vm itself is not just binding heavy but actually binding dependent in that some key functions *only* seem to work when called from a key binding rather than from M-x. I think this is true btw for certain mark-related functions with next command uses marks. So

Re: [VM] IMAP-SSL with Exchange Server

2012-06-13 Thread Lewis Perin
Lewis Perin pe...@panix.com writes: Uday Reddy usr.vm.ro...@gmail.com writes: Lewis Perin writes: When I submit my password for the (default) inbox, the connection fails immediately with vm-imap-protocol-error: IMAP protocol error: unexpected char (10) Unless you have a working

Re: [VM] IMAP-SSL with Exchange Server

2012-06-13 Thread Matthew Vernon
Lewis Perin pe...@panix.com writes: Has anyone reading this had experience connecting vm to a Microsoft Exchange IMAP-SSL server? (Successful experience, I hope!) Yes; stunnel4 and IMAP to Exchange Just Worked; My notes suggest I didn't need the additional-configuration-file option. What it

Re: [VM] Differences between IMAP-FCC and FCC

2012-06-13 Thread blueman
Uday Reddy usr.vm.ro...@gmail.com writes: blueman writes: 1. Is there any reason that IMAP-FCC doesn't include a 'From:' line whereas FCC does include a 'From:' line? The net result is that for IMAP-FCC, the vm summary gets the sender from the from line which is often then the