Re: [VM] Email dangers portrayed in media

2012-10-31 Thread James Freer
Hi Uday Sorry about the swearing. I realized, as soon as I sent off my earlier message, that I should have added a warning about it. But, having watched the whole series, I felt that, underneath all that crudity, there was a lot of subtle reality that was portrayed. I am planning to get all

Re: [VM] Email dangers portrayed in media

2012-10-31 Thread Uday Reddy
James Freer writes: Gmail UI seems more secure in that respect but their big negative is to hide bottom portion of the message which is why i went back to using an email client again. You mean, when you send a message, you can't see what stuff you are citing? That is even worse than Outlook!

Re: [VM] Email dangers portrayed in media

2012-10-31 Thread Mark Diekhans
Uday Reddy usr.vm.ro...@gmail.com writes: But the biggest negative of gmail is of course is that it productizes you. (If you don't pay for a product, you are the product.) Gmail's lacks what seems to be the most basic e-mail: you can't get e-mail message out of it uncorrupted: - There is no

Re: [VM] Email dangers portrayed in media

2012-10-31 Thread James Freer
Gmail's lacks what seems to be the most basic e-mail: you can't get e-mail message out of it uncorrupted: - There is no way to forward a message as an attachment. So you can't have someone join a thread just by forwarding the message to them. - There is no way to save