Janus Dam Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Janus
> That is great news!
>
>> As expected, the time per multiplication stayed constant when I
>> varied the number of multiplications -- with the parallel scheduling
>> there is a huge difference between doing 100 and doing 1000
>> multiplicatio
Hi Martin,
That is great news!
> As expected, the time per multiplication stayed constant when I varied
> the number of multiplications -- with the parallel scheduling there
> is a
> huge difference between doing 100 and doing 1000 multiplications (a
> factor of four in a test I did).
Do you h
