Re: [viff-devel] SMCL security notion

2008-07-24 Thread Janus Dam Nielsen
In the paper on page two, lower left, we write that each server party execute identical copies of the server program inn lock-step. Based on this assumption it is reasonable to consider the server as having a single well-defined state. However in Viff this is no longer true due to parallelism. B

Re: [viff-devel] SMCL security notion

2008-07-24 Thread Martin Geisler
Janus Dam Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Hi everybody >> I am confused about the notion of security via adversary traces >> presented in those papers. It is described via two properties: >> >> * Identity Property: a public state P can only lead to one other >> public state P', regardless o