Dear Mr. Meldgaard,
Thank you for your idea wich is very helpful to me since I actually work with p
= 53.
Using this is much more efficient !
Regards,
Jonathan
Le 9 avr. 2010 à 01:10, Sigurd Torkel Meldgaard a écrit :
I know this is talking around the problem but:
For very small moduli
ok, my problem is solved, the error came from the config files. I generated new
ones and the error was gone.
I would like to thank everyone for their help in finding the solution,
especially Mr. Keller.
Jonathan
Le 8 avr. 2010 à 23:34, Marcel Keller a écrit :
Hi Jonathan,
I can't
Dear Ivan,
Yes I know about that. But 367 is 3 mod 4 so it should be OK. And the existing
protocol works with 367 only if the two numbers are not equal. If they are, I
got the error mentioned in my first message.
If I can solve the error in the existing protocol, I will be able to continue
my
I know this is talking around the problem but:
For very small moduli like yours, another protocol for equality is
actually simpler, better (no risk of failing) and faster (I guess):
raise (a-b) to n-1 (with square and multiply), and if this difference
was 0 you will get 0, otherwise you will get
