Re: [viff-devel] Orlandi preprocessing

2009-10-22 Thread Claudio Orlandi
Correct!

On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 11:17 AM, Marcel Keller mkel...@cs.au.dk wrote:
 Hi Janus,

 I remember you saying today that the preprocessing in the OrlandiRuntime is
 more efficient per item the more items are requested. Is that correct? I ask
 because in my optimizations, I limited the items being preprocessed per call
 in order to save memory. I would of course drop that because it doesn't
 really affect the other cases.

 Best regards,
 Marcel
 ___
 viff-devel mailing list (http://viff.dk/)
 viff-devel@viff.dk
 http://lists.viff.dk/listinfo.cgi/viff-devel-viff.dk

___
viff-devel mailing list (http://viff.dk/)
viff-devel@viff.dk
http://lists.viff.dk/listinfo.cgi/viff-devel-viff.dk


Re: [viff-devel] Orlandi preprocessing

2009-10-22 Thread Ivan Damgård

I have not been following the discussion in detail, but it's true that
the more items you request, the smaller the amortized cost, at least
in theory. I also think it would be a very good idea to involve  
either Jesper

or Claudio in this, if there is any place where you are in doubt at all.

regards, Ivan

On 22/10/2009, at 20.17, Marcel Keller wrote:


Hi Janus,

I remember you saying today that the preprocessing in the  
OrlandiRuntime is more efficient per item the more items are  
requested. Is that correct? I ask because in my optimizations, I  
limited the items being preprocessed per call in order to save  
memory. I would of course drop that because it doesn't really  
affect the other cases.


Best regards,
Marcel
___
viff-devel mailing list (http://viff.dk/)
viff-devel@viff.dk
http://lists.viff.dk/listinfo.cgi/viff-devel-viff.dk


___
viff-devel mailing list (http://viff.dk/)
viff-devel@viff.dk
http://lists.viff.dk/listinfo.cgi/viff-devel-viff.dk