If there are any other ideas for optimizations you would like to see
in a compiler for Viff then now is the time to come forward.
--
Janus
Den 15/07/2008 kl. 16.49 skrev Martin Geisler:
Janus Dam Nielsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi again,
Heres the fruit of half a days work :)
Janus Dam Nielsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If there are any other ideas for optimizations you would like to see
in a compiler for VIFF then now is the time to come forward.
I have another thing to consider: the height of the resulting
arithmetic circuit.
If there are several possibilities
I have another thing to consider: the height of the resulting
arithmetic circuit.
Good idea.
If there are several possibilities for expressing the formula and each
has the same number of multiplications, then one should go for the one
with the least height: so (a*b) * (c*d) instead of
Janus Dam Nielsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If there are several possibilities for expressing the formula and
each has the same number of multiplications, then one should go for
the one with the least height: so (a*b) * (c*d) instead of ((a*b) *
c) * d.
This is more like an ordering
Janus Dam Nielsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi again,
Heres the fruit of half a days work :)
Analyzing the expression:
sint n = (a * y + (1 - a) * x);
Yields the following results:
Final result:
((a * y )+ ((1 - a )* x )) cost: 30
(((a * y )+ x )- (x * a )) cost: 30
(((a * y )+ x
