>Am Donnerstag, 3. M§rz 2005 17:58 schrieb David Cameron:
>> I probably don't fully understand the problem, but it seems to me that
>> smaller note symbols to indicate the pitch of the octave strings would do
>> much of what is required.
>>
>.. which would help but the problem of voice leadings
Regarding my last posting: It's David Grimes' books I was praising, not David
Russell's. :)
James
--
To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
Oops, yes that is where it was meant to go. Getting all my lists mixed up...
Rob
-Original Message-
From: Eugene C. Braig IV [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 03 March 2005 15:13
To: vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu
Subject: RE: waldzither
Actually, sounds like one that would be appropriate to the
In a message dated 3/3/2005 8:03:00 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
How do we feel about the methods of
modern-notation transcription employed by, for example, Strizich, Pinnell,
Russell, Pennington (I realize these are all Americans - sorry!). And just
to clarify, I'm interest
Stanley,
I await your examples, which may well show me I am way off base.
But I had in mind that the small note symbols would be used sparingly, in
accordance with what seems to me to be a rather obvious convention:
a) Show only bourdon note.Indicates both strings of the course plucked, and
the
I understand the points you're making Marion but, with respect, they're not
quite the same as that to which I was trying to draw attention: that a
recording is not necessarily a good and accurate representation of what would
be heard live (always, of course, assuming no electronic amplific
David,
What you say is true. But the mess it creates is can be a problem. I'll post
few examples this weekend.
Stanley
Dr. Stanley Yates
Professor of Music
Austin Peay State University
Department of Music
PO Box 4625
Clarksville TN 37043
(001) 931 221-7351
(001) 931 221-7529 (fax)
> --
Hello Thomas,
"Grand staff' is the correct term, though I do feel that this type of scholarly
transcritpion can easily (and often does) "overstate" the case - I don't think
that much five-course polyphony is up to such a rigorous notation. Still,
you're probably right in the sense that this is
Am Donnerstag, 3. März 2005 17:58 schrieb David Cameron:
> I probably don't fully understand the problem, but it seems to me that
> smaller note symbols to indicate the pitch of the octave strings would do
> much of what is required.
>
.. which would help but the problem of voice leadings which are
StanleyYates wrote:
"Surely there is a better solution than simply writing everything as if
played on bordons with the disclaimer about where anything below a written G
might actually sound..."
I probably don't fully understand the problem, but it seems to me that
smaller note symbols to indicate
Hi Thomas,
Thanks for your input. I think we agree on all points, but perhaps I could
re-word my original question. How do we feel about the methods of
modern-notation transcription employed by, for example, Strizich, Pinnell,
Russell, Pennington (I realize these are all Americans - sorry!). And j
Dr. Marion Ceruti wrote:
> When I record, usually no other musician records with me.
If it's any consolation, you're not the only person who has that effect on
other musicians.
To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
The balkanization of the Lutenet goes on. I have some interest in Hamburger
Citrinchen (am having one built) and Cetera Corsa. I think it's time for 2
more lists, isn't it?
RT
__
Roman M. Turovsky
http://polyhymnion.org/swv
> Actually, sounds like one that would be appropriate to the n
Actually, sounds like one that would be appropriate to the new cittern list.
Eugene
At 04:33 AM 3/3/2005, Rob MacKillop wrote:
>David Kilpatrick sent me the email below, but I think he meant to send it to
>the group.
>
>I'll be carrying too many things with me to Germany, David, so thanks for
>y
Hi Stanley and all,
Although surely well meant, the earlier editions by Karl Scheidt and Hans
Teuchert now seem inacceptable. I do well remember the answer when I asked
why he omited the rasguados: "They didn't do such things then". Also I only
know one nearly good edition of Sanz (from Rafael
David Kilpatrick sent me the email below, but I think he meant to send it to
the group.
I'll be carrying too many things with me to Germany, David, so thanks for
your offer, but no thanks. Play it yourself and come to the symposium!
Good to see you on this list.
Rob
-Original Message-
F
16 matches
Mail list logo
