[VIHUELA] Re: Corbetta 1639

The pdf I have is not bad and there is nothing visible above the bottom line (top course) for the N chord. 3 or 5 possible although 5 1 1 1 1 would be a nasty stretch (at least for me!) > On Aug 3, 2018, at 5:36 AM, mjlh...@cs.dartmouth.edu wrote: > > Has anyone got a decent digital copy of

[VIHUELA] Re: Yet more Re: [VIHUELAR) Re: Moravsky Manuscript AND five course guitar stringing

/01/2018 15:58 > To: <hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk>, "Daniel Shoskes"<dshos...@mac.com>, > "VihuelaList"<vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu>, "Baroque Lute List" l...@cs.dartmouth.edu> > Subj: Re: Yet more Re: [VIHUELAR) Re: Moravsky Manuscript AND fiv

[VIHUELA] Re: Moravsky Manuscript

SH STUART"<s.wa...@ntlworld.com> >> Cc: "VihuelaList"<vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu>, "Monica Hall" >> <mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk> >> Subj: [VIHUELA] Re: Moravsky Manuscript >> >> Sorry, let’s try a dropbox: >> https://www.dr

[VIHUELA] Re: Moravsky Manuscript

.@tiscali.co.uk> > Subj: [VIHUELA] Re: Moravsky Manuscript > > Sorry, let’s try a dropbox: > https://www.dropbox.com/s/oaqfczqgfio4gao/Losy-GuitareEtMandore.pdf?dl=0 > <https://www.dropbox.com/s/oaqfczqgfio4gao/Losy-GuitareEtMandore.pdf?dl=0> > > > >>

[VIHUELA] Re: Moravsky Manuscript

Sorry, let’s try a dropbox: https://www.dropbox.com/s/oaqfczqgfio4gao/Losy-GuitareEtMandore.pdf?dl=0 <https://www.dropbox.com/s/oaqfczqgfio4gao/Losy-GuitareEtMandore.pdf?dl=0> > On Jan 3, 2018, at 1:57 PM, WALSH STUART <s.wa...@ntlworld.com> wrote: > > On 1/3/2018 5:

[VIHUELA] Moravsky Manuscript

I’ve come across the Moravsky manuscript which is an interesting mix of bandora, baroque guitar, “6 string/course” guitar and other works in standard notation. Much music of Losy (Logy). A link is here: http://www.classicalguitardelcamp.com/viewtopic.php?t=67271

[VIHUELA] Re: Notation software recommendations?

I run Fronimo and Django on a Mac using VMware Fusion and it also is a good solution. > On Jul 20, 2017, at 7:21 PM, Nelson, Jocelyn wrote: > > Thanks; I also see that the Fuenllana solos are there, which is great, > but not the songs. > > Again, this is another