: Protocol of emails (again...)
I think that is a harder call. With this list, for example, sometimes
I'll hit reply, write my reply and then send it off only to realize
that I meant to send it to the whole list and not just the individual.
So that is one case. The other is when the priority
People sometimes complain about links not working. These References
are copies of the links that generally do work, in the first few iterations
of the message, anyways.
Wayne
I also get
rid of this sort of thing:
Ed Durbrow
Saitama, Japan
Being a robot and lacking a friendly, smiling face, I am very grateful for
the impersonal nature of e-mail. (Just kidding. ...kinda.)
Eugene
-Original Message-
From: lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu [mailto:lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] On
Behalf Of Stewart McCoy
Sent: Tuesday, December 20,
Just laughing loudly.
Monica
- Original Message -
From: Eugene C. Braig IV brai...@osu.edu
To: 'Vihuela List' vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu
Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2011 6:50 PM
Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Protocol of emails (again...)
Being a robot and lacking a friendly, smiling face, I
I fear this is a lost cause. We will never get everyone to conform. But I
think that it is usually better to put one's reply at the top of the
message. It is not helpful in anyway to have to scroll though pages of
junk to find out what the writer has said.
Having said that - I think it
continue.
cud
__
From: Monica Hall mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk
To: Martyn Hodgson hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk
Cc: Vihuelalist vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu
Sent: Sunday, December 18, 2011 8:45 AM
Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: PROTOCOL
