By 'hjistoric' ( a light joke) I meant how letters are/were stored
--- On Mon, 18/4/11, R. Mattes r...@mh-freiburg.de wrote:
From: R. Mattes r...@mh-freiburg.de
Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: list - protocol
To: Monica Hall mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk, Martyn Hodgson
hodgsonmar
All I can say is that I agree with this. The problem arises when
several people reply to a message consecutively, some at the top and
some at the bottom.
The important thing is to keep the discussion in a logical sequence
which everyone can follow.
Monica
-
On Mon, 18 Apr 2011 17:42:10 +0100, Monica Hall forwarded
From: [1]Martyn Hodgson
As said, the reply at the top is usual (and historic!) practice. But
it's also always a good idea to cut and paste in the relevant section
one is queying/amplifying if the original is long
This
).
Eugene
-Original Message-
From: lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu [mailto:lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] On
Behalf Of R. Mattes
Sent: Monday, April 18, 2011 2:06 PM
To: Monica Hall; Martyn Hodgson
Cc: Vihuelalist
Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: list - protocol
On Mon, 18 Apr 2011 17:42:10 +0100
PM
Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: list - protocol
Alas, the tyrannical giant Microsoft and its forced default of
top-replying
so dominates the universe of electronic communication that I fear there is
no easy way back to a rational conversational civility. This note was
typed
using MS Outlook
