Quoting Paul Irofti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> If I :cd to another directory and then :E to browse through I get the
> directory where the current buffer resides. Is this correct/wanted
> behavior? And if so why?
You might also want to consider setting g:netrw_keepdir=0 in your .vimrc.
By default g:n
; > To: Max Dyckhoff
> > Cc: Paul Irofti; vim@vim.org
> > Subject: Re: :cd and :E
> >
> > Max Dyckhoff wrote:
> > >>From :help :E, it looks like it is the correct behaviour.
> > >>
> > > :Explore[!] [dir]... Explore directory
I am so dense sometimes, I should have thought of that instantly :)
Max
> -Original Message-
> From: A.J.Mechelynck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, September 02, 2006 3:45 PM
> To: Max Dyckhoff
> Cc: Paul Irofti; vim@vim.org
> Subject: Re: :cd and :E
>
Max Dyckhoff wrote:
From :help :E, it looks like it is the correct behaviour.
:Explore[!] [dir]... Explore directory of current file
If you want to explore an arbitrary directory, then just add the
directory that you :cd into to the :E command. I don't know of a command
to browse the
Paul Irofti wrote:
Hi vim(m?)ers,
If I :cd to another directory and then :E to browse through I get the
directory where the current buffer resides. Is this correct/wanted
behavior? And if so why?
Thanks,
Paul.
Have you set 'autochdir'? If yes, then the directory where the current
buffer
It's to late apparently, it seems I only replied to Max, sorry about
that too. :-(
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Re: :cd and :E
Date: Sunday 03 September 2006 01:10
From: Paul Irofti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Max Dyckhoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On
working directory, sorry!
Max
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul Irofti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, September 02, 2006 2:59 PM
> To: vim@vim.org
> Subject: :cd and :E
>
> Hi vim(m?)ers,
>
> If I :cd to another directory and then :E to browse thro
Hi vim(m?)ers,
If I :cd to another directory and then :E to browse through I get the
directory where the current buffer resides. Is this correct/wanted
behavior? And if so why?
Thanks,
Paul.