Hi Bram :)
* Bram Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] dixit:
DervishD wrote:
I mean, that's not the point. The point is that the source code is
using hardcoded directories, and that is not a good practice, even if
you force to have all runtime files under the same directory, because
Hi Tony :)
* A.J.Mechelynck [EMAIL PROTECTED] dixit:
Bram Moolenaar wrote:
[...]
I don't see how getting rid of hardcoded directories in the source
code is going to cause problems for users ;) In fact, hardcoded
directories may cause problems: if you modify src/Makefile and don't
Hi Bram :)
* Bram Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] dixit:
DervishD wrote:
Don't take me wrong: I'm not critisizing Bram's amazing work with
Vim, and I'm not asking for this to be fixed. What I really mean is
that Vim will be more flexible if it doesn't have that hardcoded paths
and
DervishD wrote:
I mean, that's not the point. The point is that the source code is
using hardcoded directories, and that is not a good practice, even if
you force to have all runtime files under the same directory, because
someone could change one of the many variables under src/Makefile
DervishD wrote:
Hi all, specially Bram :)
The source code for vim is full of hardcoded directories,
rendering useless the constants defined in src/Makefile. Moreover, it
doesn't use configure values to establish locations, but that's a
minor problem. The major problem is that this
