On 2/25/07, Tim Chase [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Grepping for something seems to be trivial with :vimgrep and :grep but
there's nothing simple like this for 'searchreplace' and i wonder
why... Is it done intentionally or i'm just missing something?
Just missing the power of the
On 2/25/07, Pavel Shevaev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/25/07, Tim Chase [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Grepping for something seems to be trivial with :vimgrep and :grep but
there's nothing simple like this for 'searchreplace' and i wonder
why... Is it done intentionally or i'm just missing
When vim is given 500 file arguments, it opens only
the first one. Regarding the other 499 files, it just
remembers the names, for the beginning, so you see the first tfile very quicky.
Only when you explicitly visit/open some of the other files, vim
will actually read its contents. Just try it
On 2/25/07, Pavel Shevaev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When vim is given 500 file arguments, it opens only
the first one. Regarding the other 499 files, it just
remembers the names, for the beginning, so you see the first tfile very
quicky.
Only when you explicitly visit/open some of the other
Pavel Shevaev wrote:
On 2/25/07, Tim Chase [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Grepping for something seems to be trivial with :vimgrep and :grep but
there's nothing simple like this for 'searchreplace' and i wonder
why... Is it done intentionally or i'm just missing something?
Just missing the power
