Bill McCarthy wrote:
On Wed 20-Sep-06 1:08pm -0600, Tim Chase wrote:
I hadn't seen a reply to this fly by, so I thought I'd let you
know it wasn't entirely ignored :)
It appears that :s/pattern produces the same result as
:s/pattern//. I couldn't find that behavior in the docs.
On 9/22/06, Eric Leenman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
I have a file where I deleted all lines that don't contain a certain pattern
For example I want to delete all lines that don't contain XXX and YYY.
Before:
[start of file]
abcde XXX fghij YYY
12345 AAA 67890 BBB
klmno XXX pqrst YYY
09876
I scoured through the help, looking in a multitude of places I
deemed sensible, and couldn't find anything documented either.
Thanks, Tim, for confirming this feature.
Bram, could you please add a note to the help for ':s' that
documents this feature?
I thought this was explained somewhere,
I hadn't seen a reply to this fly by, so I thought I'd let you
know it wasn't entirely ignored :)
It appears that :s/pattern produces the same result as
:s/pattern//. I couldn't find that behavior in the docs.
A hidden feature? (Or was I just not creative enough using
helpgrep?)
I'm not
On Wed 20-Sep-06 1:08pm -0600, Tim Chase wrote:
I hadn't seen a reply to this fly by, so I thought I'd let you
know it wasn't entirely ignored :)
It appears that :s/pattern produces the same result as
:s/pattern//. I couldn't find that behavior in the docs.
A hidden feature? (Or was I
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 at 1:08pm, Tim Chase wrote:
I hadn't seen a reply to this fly by, so I thought I'd let you
know it wasn't entirely ignored :)
It appears that :s/pattern produces the same result as
:s/pattern//. I couldn't find that behavior in the docs.
A hidden feature? (Or was
Wim R. Crols wrote:
Hi,
Not really a request for help, but I was wondering if you guys ever use
the 's' command.
It's just a shortcut for 'cl', which I almost never need. Since I don't
assume it was put in to be complete or something, I'm intrigued by it's
enigmatic purpose. :)
Thanks,
Wim
Thanks for all the explanations everyone. I do see your points, and will
try to add 's' to my weaponry :)
Wim
On 6/30/06, Wim R. Crols [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Not really a request for help, but I was wondering if you guys ever use
the 's' command.
It's just a shortcut for 'cl', which
Not really a request for help, but I was wondering if you guys ever use
the 's' command.
It's just a shortcut for 'cl', which I almost never need. Since I don't
assume it was put in to be complete or something, I'm intrigued by it's
enigmatic purpose. :)
I'll admit that it took me a while
Not really a request for help, but I was wondering if you guys ever use
the 's' command.
It's just a shortcut for 'cl', which I almost never need. Since I don't
assume it was put in to be complete or something, I'm intrigued by it's
enigmatic purpose. :)
Well, I use it when I want to
On Friday 30 June 2006 15:16, Wim R. Crols wrote:
Peter Slizik wrote:
Not really a request for help, but I was wondering if you guys ever use
the 's' command.
It's just a shortcut for 'cl', which I almost never need. Since I don't
assume it was put in to be complete or something, I'm
I can't remember why or when (it was so long ago), but I've always
used 's' and 'S' in 'vi'. It never really occured to me to use 'cl'
instead. It was just another command in the list.
It was part of the original 'vi', but I'm not sure if you meant that
by 'put in to be complete'.
It is no
12 matches
Mail list logo