When I first saw thefeature, I thought it was a just a
cleaner way of avoiding the :ex interaction in:call in
map \a : call Tst()
Since I'm still not really clear on why there is a difference with
respect to recursion handling, I thought I should ask whether using
the above is
Eric Arnold wrote:
> I'm not sure what the intended fix for 70d was, but I can no longer
> send a char to a function indirectly through an mapping,
> meaning that in the example below, \b does not send a to
> Tst(). Tst() waits for input directly from the user.
>
> Note: using
>
I'm not sure what the intended fix for 70d was, but I can no longer send a char
to a function indirectly through an mapping, meaning that in the example
below, \b does not send a to Tst(). Tst() waits for input directly
from the user.
Note: using
map \a : call Tst()
works as e
I'm not sure what the intended fix for 70d was, but I can no longer send a char
to a function indirectly through an mapping, meaning that in the example
below, \b does not send a to Tst(). Tst() waits for input directly
from the user.
Note: using
map \a : call Tst()
works as e
